mbrochh on nostr

My favorite part of today: I observed that in the Knots v Core debate, the Core side leans on emotion and the Knots side leans on technical/logical arguments Immediately, Core supporters responded wi...

Martin @mbrochh 1758253407

We must be living in parallel universes.

From what I can see, Core always argues calmly, professionally, with logic and technical arguments

while Knots always argues with emotional fallacies, false analogies, and plenty of ad-hominem and conspiracy theories.

3❤️2💯2

Martin · 25w

That being said, Calle is an arrogant fuck and doesn't care about how he choses his words in this debate at all. Wouldn't assume that his opinion/behaviour represents "the Core side".

jgbtc · 25w

They calmly and professionally call anyone who disagrees with them an idiot.

Akashi Hyogo · 25w

There was an scaling solution that needs slightly bigger OP_RETURN so they decided to bloat utxo set instead. When core saw that they decided to increase memeppol limit. What was the scaling project? I forgot and can't find it under all op_return rage. :D

Akashi Hyogo · 25w

You are stuck in the past (few weeks :D). Core people got annoyed by sub-par core arguments and either stopped responding or responded with snarky comments. This provoked a new breed of knots arguers with more coherent arguments.

PsyOp · 25w

So what are the professional, logical, and technical arguments for easier CSAM inclusion into the blockchain (and we know it *will* happen)? This enables a new .gov attack surface. We can only go from zero to one once. Why assume this risk?