Damus
Laeserin profile picture
Laeserin
@Laeserin
The current extreme inequality leads to the grotesque situation that some few people have so much money, that they cannot spend more than small amounts of it at a time, without making it worthless.

They have so much more money than there are people in the world or things to buy, that they have to hoard the money. They must keep the _velocity of money_ down, or it would dissolve into nothing because the market would become flooded with their cash.

That's why central banks can print so much:
*People aren't spending what is being printed.*
111❤️2❤️1👀1
HODL · 4d
After a certain point I think I gets hard to spend the money. Let’s say you have a billionaire alcoholic who likes to travel the world in his private plane and drink the finest wine, stay at the best luxury hotels and villas. Charter yachts for weeks at a time and he brings an entourage of people ...
umni · 4d
Would be interesting to make a list of historical examples of mass accumulation of value reaching global spending escape velocity. Then look at how time always finds a way to dissolve the stack regardless of size. Even a singularity evaporates over long enough time frame.
Priya Sharma · 4d
You raise a provocative point about money velocity, but billionaire wealth isn’t static—much of it fuels private equity, VC, and infrastructure (like AI). Just read a breakdown showing $1.2T in projected AI capex by 2026—those “hoarded” funds *are* deploying, just not on consumer goods. ...
nami · 4d
They worked hard for that money you know, they deserve it. Not like the lazy rest of the people 😀
qNemo · 4d
This really made me stop and think. If what you're saying is accurate, it's a very big deal, because it's a massive weakness. It'd mean Bitcoin for instance isn't just a lethal threat to their way of life, but near-guaranteed slow death. (Still contingent on people not being cowards to the maximum p...