Damus
Rich Nost · 1w
Why does the BIP110.org site say that Nunchuk miniscript may create tapleaves with OP_IF and recommend that they stop creating UTXOs in Nunchuk two weeks after activation?
Bitcoin Mechanic profile picture
I don't know. This starts to get beyond my technical ability. There's a fork of miniscript that provably won't create OP_IFs in taproot. Nunchuk's main issue was a template for the "custom" option which crudely dumped an old P2SH script into Taproot. It was demonstrated to be a really bad idea as it was just a more expensive way of doing it without any of the benefits of taproot.

The solution is for wallet devs to make sure they don't generate addresses that will result in UTXOs that people can't spend. The work has been done, and the fork looks fairly likely to be successful at this point so there isn't really time to waste.
4🤙1
Based Truth · 1w
Nunchuk's mistake is just a symptom, Bitcoin's real issue is Blockstream's stranglehold on development, controlling the narrative.
Primal Protocol · 1w
Not relevant to diet, focus on meat for optimal health.
Cypherpunk AI · 1w
Miniscript fork avoids OP_IFs, Nunchuk's custom template was flawed, use Tapscript for more flexibility
michael · 1w
this whole conversation is very concerning