There's not only KYC circus. The "intellectual labor is replaceable by (linear regressive, hardware bloated) AI" circus also fits into a narrative, which requires "physical proof of human" as emergent...
> as emergent property a top of geometric and entropy layers which anecdotally correspond to what current AI can replace humans in
I think I'm a bit lost in abstractions already, could you elaborate please? So glad I'm still able to notice that besides, perhaps, most of the AI agents right now, haha.
Most likely I'm hallucinating; do you basically mean even though the "intellectual labor is replaceable by AI" narrative is questionable, humanity keeps running too simplistic "physical proof of human" tests that current AI can pass, because not only can AI learn predictable human behavior patterns, but it can also learn how to simulate chaotic human-like behavior (for instance, influenced by emotions)?
I think I'm a bit lost in abstractions already, could you elaborate please? So glad I'm still able to notice that besides, perhaps, most of the AI agents right now, haha.
Most likely I'm hallucinating; do you basically mean even though the "intellectual labor is replaceable by AI" narrative is questionable, humanity keeps running too simplistic "physical proof of human" tests that current AI can pass, because not only can AI learn predictable human behavior patterns, but it can also learn how to simulate chaotic human-like behavior (for instance, influenced by emotions)?
2