Any interpretation of quantum mechanics that treats contradictory states as ontologically real, without a defined temporal resolution mechanism (measurement), is incomplete.
No quantum threat should be taken seriously if it relies on a model that cannot explain how contradiction is eliminated across time.
Bitcoin enforces non-contradiction through quantized blocks of time. We do not know whether a double spend has occurred until the next block proves otherwise, which means conservation of identity can only be demonstrated as a temporal proof.
This directly invalidates the axiom of continuous time. Either it must be shown that Bitcoin can prevent double spending without discrete blocks of time, or it must be accepted that time itself is quantized in order to preserve logic. Physics must account for the double spend experiment as a real model of temporal resolution, or be prepared to falsify Bitcoin to proceed touting “quantum threat”.
Check.
No quantum threat should be taken seriously if it relies on a model that cannot explain how contradiction is eliminated across time.
Bitcoin enforces non-contradiction through quantized blocks of time. We do not know whether a double spend has occurred until the next block proves otherwise, which means conservation of identity can only be demonstrated as a temporal proof.
This directly invalidates the axiom of continuous time. Either it must be shown that Bitcoin can prevent double spending without discrete blocks of time, or it must be accepted that time itself is quantized in order to preserve logic. Physics must account for the double spend experiment as a real model of temporal resolution, or be prepared to falsify Bitcoin to proceed touting “quantum threat”.
Check.
10❤️1
