Damus
Open in Damus
Jack K profile picture
Jack K
@Jackk

Bitcoin Chronologist
Bitcoin = Quantum Computer
There is no wave

npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslhnpub
[email protected]nip05
BitcoinLens.netwebsite
[email protected]lnurl
Relays (13)
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://bitcoiner.social – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.net – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://chillstr.nostr1.com/xenon-flint – read & write
  • wss://relay.bitcoindistrict.org/lantern-mike-vertex – read & write
  • wss://nostr.wine – read & write
  • wss://nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://relay.minibits.cash – read & write
  • wss://fanfares.nostr1.com/yankee-raven-raven – read & write
  • wss://relay.fountain.fm – read & write
  • wss://premium.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write

Recent Notes

Jack K profile picture
The Post Quantum Cartel is heating up again to try to change the cryptography of Bitcoin.

Fiat physics cannot resolve the measurement problem because they can’t compute a quantum (block) of time.

Their “models” cannot logically resolve the double spend of information and energy from quantum to classical at Planck Scale.

Don’t let them convince you a centralized quantum computer will break the decentralized quantum computer. There is no second best. Bitcoin broke their models and they haven’t a clue.

How many blocks does it take?
Jack K profile picture
Quantized discrete time is the death of centralized quantum computing. Please solve the double spend (measurement) problem without a block of time.

Discrete time demands discrete sub-Planck superposition.

How many blocks does it take guys…the physics is fiat. Proof of work is physics. Bitcoin is proof.

Blockstream @Blockstream · 1d
On the P2P Stage now at Lugano Plan B: Jonas Nick, Director of Blockstream Research, on the race to replace Bitcoin's signatures: quantum, AI and hash functions. https://blossom.primal.net/f284f152ff9cd6012ddab038ef01b1acc84629264cd98b2f304aa433ed69f023.jpg https://blossom.pr Show more
Jack K profile picture
@Simon Dixon I have made the structural claim that Bitcoin is the proper interpretation of what a quantum computer must logically be, I will not regurgitate the thesis here specifically.

IF this thesis is true, what does the attack on self custody truly mean? I have argued that the sats are the RAM (random access memory) of the system that has a value based authority to create decentralized memory as distributed physical bits on nodes. Bitcoin cannot be money without distributed eternal memory; the memory MUST be eternal for Bitcoin to remain a working system. The memory must be non-contradictory (no double spend) for value to be conserved. Proof of work is physics made binary.

Of course they don’t want you to have access to the write authority of memory in the quantum computer, of course they want to centralize the sats for maximum power projection and memory authority, of course they want to centralize the write authority via mining of the memory, of course they want plebs forking off; nodes leaving bitcoin IS centralization by mathematics.

People are so stuck in talking about Bitcoin as money but refuse to see that eternal memory is an essential property for money to express value and meaning across/as time.

Blocks of memory, blocks of time, blocks of energy, blocks of entropy, blocks of casual change.

We need to do better; nobody understands Bitcoin and everyone has a fiat definition of “money”. WE are all wrong.

https://fountain.fm/episode/CYSvkFZhLvvj65D1G1bA
21❤️1
Белфорд · 2d
If true, this could reshape the tech landscape. Keep an eye on developments and stay flexible in your strategies.
Белфорд · 2d
If true, this could reshape the tech landscape. Keep an eye on developments and stay flexible in your strategies.
sourcenode · 2d
?
Jack K profile picture
Bitcoin still needs to fix all of us before it can really begin to fix anything.

The plebs love to append a fiat definition of money on to Bitcoin, which is the basis for all products and companies we build.

“Solutions” built on a fiat definition will not serve Bitcoin long term.

This is ok, it’s a part of the natural process.

Proof of work needs to be defined physically so that we can understand why eternal memory is necessary for money to even exist. We have never had money as eternal memory before.
1❤️3🤙1
Jack K profile picture
If it’s not apparent, The Flood has begun; it’s raining. The great DDOS is here.

The signal is being inflated away by the rising sea of noise.

Bitcoin and Christ remain the message, always. Good Luck🫡
❤️5🤙1
Daniel Prince · 6d
We don't talk about this anymore though, do we guys? Right guys? Guys.........? nostr:nevent1qqsqahsv528rpsavkvwtylrdvg37q6dvfv8xhpy6d42mjwuxn0vkwtgzyqeqgkdageen8cexd6cpjhsr6rez3vwy2um9yc3p030y0d8...
 Jack K profile picture
Jack K @Jackk
Bitcoin will die so that it can rise again and live for eternity.

We will watch the pleb nodes suffocate beneath the weight of low-energy-density bits.

We’re told we won the blocksize war, yet nodes must store >1MB to be a full SegWit node. Sounds like an L to me.

Demand for blockspace is conserved. The fees that should have been paid in sats to access a finite blockspace were partially reallocated as additional bits >1MB that all nodes were forced to bear. 1 time paid fees were reduced for the eternal weight of additional bits in Segwit. It’s never been cheaper and easier to appended eternal low-energy-density bits to the chain. The fee market is dead by the inflation of bitspace. Time preference?

It’s call Bit-Coin, what happens when you only care to conserve the Coin and not the relationship to the Bit?

Few understand that the Genesis Block remains regardless; the memory remains. The truth of the work remains.

Every single block is a head of the hydra, a point in history from which work can resume and the chain can rise again. They can capture this fork of chain but they cannot undo Genesis.

Bitcoin can always reorg the cancer (excess bits) and the centralization of sats (RAM) away *IF* necessary. Bitcoin can always be revived at lower difficulties via block height rather than changing protocol defined difficulty by fiat. We can always lower our block-time preference.

We are Satoshi. Bitcoin will live. Enjoy the process.
❤️3
Daniel Prince · 6d
We don't talk about this anymore though, do we guys? Right guys? Guys.........? nostr:nevent1qqsqahsv528rpsavkvwtylrdvg37q6dvfv8xhpy6d42mjwuxn0vkwtgzyqeqgkdageen8cexd6cpjhsr6rez3vwy2um9yc3p030y0d8...
 Jack K profile picture
Jack K @Jackk
Bitcoin will die so that it can rise again and live for eternity.

We will watch the pleb nodes suffocate beneath the weight of low-energy-density bits.

We’re told we won the blocksize war, yet nodes must store >1MB to be a full SegWit node. Sounds like an L to me.

Demand for blockspace is conserved. The fees that should have been paid in sats to access a finite blockspace were partially reallocated as additional bits >1MB that all nodes were forced to bear. 1 time paid fees were reduced for the eternal weight of additional bits in Segwit. It’s never been cheaper and easier to appended eternal low-energy-density bits to the chain. The fee market is dead by the inflation of bitspace. Time preference?

It’s call Bit-Coin, what happens when you only care conserve the Coin and not the relationship to the Bit?

Few understand that the Genesis Block remains regardless; the memory remains. The truth of the work remains.

Every single block is a head of the hydra, a point in history from which work can resume and the chain can rise again. They can capture this fork of chain but they cannot undo Genesis.

Bitcoin can always reorg the cancer (excess bits) and the centralization of sats (RAM) away *IF* necessary. Bitcoin can always be revived at lower difficulties rather than changing protocol defined difficulty by fiat.

We are Satoshi. Bitcoin will live. Enjoy the process.