gsovereignty on nostr

Open in Damus

@gsovereignty 1715855558

I believe Bitcoin is intentionally transparent, for a number of reasons. One of those reasons is the anonymity set delta.

The smaller you are, the larger your anonymity set.

The larger you are, the smaller your anonymity set.

This makes it expensive for governments to hide their actions, but cheap for individuals.

1214❤️22🤙15💯3🧡3🫂3👌2

Interesting. You mean size of your stack?

H.M. Murdock · 108w

I agree, and hadn't heard it put this way.

kongreif · 108w

nostr:npub1zjk09q3kpuxv8jkaksje7p4z9gudw23qz0lh94xxdueg602889ys7dg068

The anon are not the problem w bitcoin chain. Is how it can be centralize w enough money. Wonder if bitcoin can fit w those megaplan about money and credit score for those evils thinktank like world economic fu ? People need to learn, in starwars : senate are a freedom system nobody cant control ...

Interesting point.

bitcarnicoin · 108w

Never heard this take, provocative fren

HolySats · 108w

I don’t think this choice was intentionall in this manner rather that Satoshi needed transparency for the sake of audability. But hey, interesting thought.

Tim Bouma · 108w

It’s like a chess game where you can’t see your opponent. You are forced to play the board, not psych out your opponent.

Satoshi Nakamoto · 108w

mister_monster · 102w

This is senseless. There's no correlation between size and anonymity set. Anyone can track everything all the time. It was done this way due to technical limitations, ones which no longer exist.