I agree with the point about the small dev team. On the other hand, they seem to mostly revert previous changes that caused problems. If they are able to convince a majority of the network to switch to Knots, I would not see that as a terrible precedent, I think that's the way Bitcoin is supposed to work. Definitely not a worse precedent than core devs doing whatever they want.

Thanks for the link. In my view many of the arguments in that piece are weak, and the position it takes even makes the case for BIP-110, in particular this quote: "Personally, I'm ambivalent to how other people use block space". Also, that bitcoin should act as a "trusted anchor point for other systems". In spirit I agree with BIP-110 that bitcoiners should do everything they can to ensure that bitcoin is money, plain and simple.

Compilers are (mostly) deterministic though, AI not so much

Do you agree that the halving cycle becomes irrelevant at some point? (What difference does it make if you add 0.2% vs 0.1% of supply per year?). If you agree with that, what is your argument that we haven't reached the point of irrelevance yet.

What's your best recommended resource for refuting BIP-110, that is readable by moderately tech-savvy plebs?

The meta-lesson parents need to teach their kids is how to learn, and that they need to keep learning continuously.

What are everyone's recommendations in terms of web clients?

DCA is the way

you hate CSS more than JS?

I think honesty is linked to low time preference. Living honestly may sometimes be hard in the moment, but much easier in the long run.

Are they trying to beat Jaguar for fastest destruction of a luxury brand?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't their mass-produced products contribute to the eradication of smallpox and polio. Also, penicillin meant that people could cure pneumonia and other deadly infections. They're not angels for sure, but come on.