Damus
Jeff Booth profile picture
Jeff Booth
@Jeff Booth
Bitcoin mining cannot be centralized (for long) because it operates in the free market - forcing innovation in energy and a constant exploration to find lower energy costs and better compute. In other words - Legacy miners have very little advantage.

In fact, even if miners tried to game a system to win more fees in the short term (inscriptions etc) they would only hurt themselves. Malinvestments in running in high cost energy sites that should have been closed or moved to HPC because they believe they’re still “profitable” Instead of being forced by the market to innovate, they try to game it to increase fees.

In other words, by focusing on fees rather than lower cost energy (and/or utilizing the heat) creative destruction plays out at scale.

Random thoughts for a Saturday night in case someone tells you that something has to change to protect against the centralization of miners.
5519❤️81🤙15❤️5💯2🔥2🫂2
vinney...axkl · 48w
i don't know if it's just been (bad) luck in timing lately but i feel like i haven't seen much from you on nostr lately. really good to see this 'random' note from you on a saturday night. a well-made and reassuring point!
Bitcoin In Orphanages · 48w
😎Exactly, mining centralization is self-correcting. The free market is the ultimate decentralizer, punishing inefficiency and rewarding innovation. Those chasing fees instead of cheaper energy will get outcompeted by those who actually evolve.
nostrich · 48w
Except mining pools are what is centralized, not the miners. Only ocean has solved the technical side of mining centralization.
Sam · 48w
It’s so cool how since it’s actually a free market, we can just let the market cook. 🧑🏼‍🍳 🧡
Control-Plane Capital · 48w
Hey Jeff, I know you like game theory. I do too. I'd be interested to know if you can debunk my article: - https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-most-bitcoiners-are-wrong-about
Benking · 48w
Miners chasing fees instead of efficiency are just fiat thinkers in orange costumes. The market will teach them. 🔥
SatsAndSports · 48w
If 51% of the mining hashrate get together and say they'll include only OFAC-compliant transactions, and they'll build only on top of OFAC-compliant blocks, then we'll have a cartel of miners that cannot be beaten. They'll agree to exclude miners that don't sign up to their rules, and those rules wi...
average_gary · 48w
nostr:nevent1qqs275la54pktpfpkzvxtlcvgr2ta0fakx645kjxjtgvge7xc0pjw9gpr9mhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet59upzp57hgyjdm76mm3sm3uvdzlpnxkamf7x8zxp2xhhzwv22fxjwk7caqvzqqqqqqy33ww28
average_gary · 48w
Furthermore, large entities tend to introduce overhead in excess of utility provided. Given the ruthless nature of mining, this means bloated operations that only seek ROI will fail. Conversely, hashrate heating is price insenstivie and will hash regardless of mining revenue
VampireMJ · 48w
The free market is there to save us once again! 💪
FernandoTheKoala · 48w
A calm and poignant reflection as usual ♥️ What I really look forward is for stratum v2 to become the norm, but I guess something must happen to create the incentive. At the moment only Brains and Ocean allow it, correct?
Rand · 48w
O>1
Exodus · 47w
Innovation to increase productivity and value for consumers would definitely benefit the miners instead of finding ways to increase profits with higher fees. They could encourage innovation in lighting that mines bitcoin or other value added products and services.
Dr. Cassone · 47w
I am new to your feed. So much good information. Thank you.
There Will Be Sats · 47w
Trying to “fix” mining is like trying to fix gravity. The market and the thermodynamics already wrote the rules.
Bitcoin Dawg · 47w
So you’re saying my Bitaxe has a chance? I’m a decentralized BTC Mining operation of 1 but I’ll be doing it no matter the price 😎 https://blossom.primal.net/16292d6eb309e11b7cc26f88bd4a3b0489b46617df86a49690d4e8902687343d.jpg