Damus
Jack K · 2d
Linked our website with our work here for you, but my nostr is littered with my ideas. I’ll try to keep this brief and at a high level 😅 https://bitcoinlens.net/ I’m not entirely sure how to ...
Jack K profile picture
@Peter McCormack hop in here for some of my adjacent thoughts that link to your latest pods on simulation theory.

Computational physics; it’s not a theory since Bitcoin is running. Bitcoin supersedes words on a paper. Bitcoin is not a theory. Stephen Wolfram and Federico Faggin are both pointing here, but both are missing Bitcoin.

Simulation Theory = Proof of Stake = Crypto. Time is inherited, not computed.

Computation Physics = Proof of Work = Bitcoin. Time is computed through discrete blocks.

Without proof of work, you’d never have energy/mass equivalence of information, as Melvin stated its “game over” if we have it. I agree, it’s been game over since 2009. Melvin doesn’t understand Bitcoin is his answer. A coherent universe necessarily requires proof of work extratemporally to produce a block of time. We have released a framework to calculate the energy/mass equivalence of information (a block of time) using Bitcoin as the protocol and the empirical experiment that is globally running and verifiable. We are waiting for anybody to verify the logics/mathematics.

We don’t have to wait for the protocol to be built, we don’t have to wait for funding for the experiment. We have 17 years of data in Bitcoin, we can understand it right now. It’s us and our perspective that needs changing, not the protocol. “Just money”.

Bitcoin is the true interpretation of a quantum computer, which points to and verifies both computation physics and the trinity.

The only question is how many blocks does it take for people to get it? Everyone understands Bitcoin at their own block of time. 😉

Cheers!
1
BangBitcoin2 · 1d
Pete!!!!!!! Please get Jack and Nick on the show!!!!!