Damus
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž · 29w
idgi
jb55 · 29w
no
✨ USA ✨ USA ✨ β˜‰ βŠ– ⊜ ⁷ · 29w
dies this have anything to do with replies disappearing? or emojis falling out of replies?
Vitor Pamplona · 29w
yep
Dr. The Daniel πŸ–– · 29w
We use NIP22 comments on nostr:npub1xxdd8eusvdxmaph3fkuu9x2mymhrcc3ghe2l38zv0l4f4nqp659qskkt7a recipes, since those aren’t intended to show up in public feed threads, but I’m not sure I get why a kind 1 note shouldn’t also have a kind 1 reply. Wouldn’t that make reposting and quote-posting i...
mar · 29w
I don't like how kind 1 is both a note and a reply
Derek Ross · 29w
https://m.primal.net/MuQn.gif
greenart7c3 · 29w
Imagine being able to remove the 100 ifs for a reply only feed
stl1988 · 29w
NIP-22 already does this. It clearly says when replying to events that is not kind 1, then kind 1111 is to be used.
semisol · 29w
for what benefit?
CameriπŸ¦β€πŸ”₯ · 29w
Why
fiatjaf · 29w
Clients can begin to offer a "quiet reply" mode that uses NIP-22. Users can opt-in to that when they don't want their reply to show up on their feeds to everybody (and accept that at least for now it might not show up for the thread author either). I would probably use it a lot.