On NIP-46 it's more complicated. Amber already batches, but there's high overhead. NIP-44 size limit was blocking us but now it's not. We can fix with a new `batch()` rpc that works like: `batch([["nip44.decrypt", pubkey1, ciphertext1], ["nip44.decrypt", pubkey1, ciphertext1], ...etc])`. The signer interface in your code should still use granular methods but should batch calls in the same event loop (or with a short delay) as a matter of transport.

Look at how Ditto Extension does it. It batches the requests into a single dialog (see "Show 31 more" in the pic). This is inspired by Amber. The NIP-07 interface is perfect, but signers must do this.

You guys should try it! I think you'll enjoy: https://armada.buzz/ And if any of y'all can figure out how to hack or disrupt it I'll pay you Bitcoin, up to $1,000 depending on the severity of your find. Email: [email protected]

For now Regular Bitcoin is working fine.

Regular Bitcoin

Yep

I think it's important to see because it makes you realize how everyone on this network is worshipping pennies.

@utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 you zapped me 1 penny. Is this the Lightning mentality?

Yes. It pretends to be Claude Code. Claude Code has MCP so it follows the exact same API patterns. It's still possible they could ban your account.