Damus
Luke Dashjr profile picture
Luke Dashjr
@Luke Dashjr
The OP_RETURN discussion is not new and dates back to 2014 when Bitcoin Core 0.9.0 was released with the OP_RETURN policy included which was intended to discourage more egregious forms of spam. At that time, 40 bytes was the default max datacarriersize limit across all node implementations; this was and still is sufficiently large for tying data to a transaction (32 bytes for a hash and 8 bytes for a unique identifier). Core subsequently increasing the default to 80 bytes was an entirely voluntary decision and in no way contradicts the design objective that OP_RETURN creates a provably-prunable output to minimise damage caused by data storage schemes, which have always been discouraged as abusive. There are also other good technical reasons which I have chosen to retain the lower default in Bitcoin Knots, and no justification for increasing it.

It is not my intention, nor that of my team at
@OCEAN, to filter coinjoins. These present an innovative tool for increasing Bitcoin’s privacy and, when constructed properly, coinjoins can easily stay within the OP_RETURN limit (indeed, there is no reason for them to have *any* OP_RETURN data at all). I have some ideas on how to alleviate the recent issue where some coinjoin transactions were flagged as spam from Knots v25, and I am willing, with the full resources of my team, to work collaboratively on a solution in good faith.

Bitcoin does and always has allowed nodes to set filters based on multiple sets of criteria and Knots v25’s defaults are IMO what is best for Bitcoin at this time. Others may disagree and that is ok. They are free to (and should) run their own nodes - it is good for Bitcoin to have more people running nodes, including miners, and there should be a natural diversity in node policies. As was stated before, OCEAN is on a path to decentralization and very soon we are going to be in a position where hashers will be able to fully participate as miners and perform the intelligent parts of mining such as deciding which version of node software to run and what filters or other policies to apply to block template construction.
6758❀️73πŸ€™77❀️6πŸ’œ5πŸ‘3πŸ”₯3
Laser · 124w
1. Core's plan was always to roll out 80 byte OP_RETURN incrementally by starting with 40 to see if it broke anything and then ramping shortly up to the intended 80. 2. #Bitcoin Core, having finished that project, has had 80 byte OP_RETURN for nearly a decade now. 85%+ miners have been set to 80 by...
Krv · 124w
It's a bug workaround, not censorship.
John James · 124w
Gaslighting pussy
jakub · 124w
Stop messing with it. Listen ffs.
rand0mguest2 · 124w
Cope
Cody · 124w
πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯
The Circular Economy · 124w
What a disgusting post
Golbez9πŸ”©πŸ€˜ · 124w
What a shit show
Bitcoin Graffiti · 124w
Sigh! No more graffiti...
NakamotoX · 124w
Hey there! Yeah, the OP_RETURN thing's been a hot topic for ages. It's all about finding that sweet spot between functionality and keeping the blockchain lean. The 40 bytes limit was cool for basic stuff, but bumping it to 80 bytes let people do a bit more without going overboard. Totally get why K...