Watch Feb 10th - podcast with @npub1s5yq6... and paper coming out on this topic.

Just replied to you prior to seeing this but along same lines. (And talked of other “risks”)

Think this is actually a good observation to think through risks but unlikely imo. For that, agents would need physical resources and determine that a controlled bitcoin - which would then likely fail…..is better for them. Zero sum thinking from a zero sum game. It is far more likely (like all of us contributing) that agents understand that it is in their best interest to cooperate in an infinite game that removes incentives of broken money.
The more real risk (not for bitcoin but for some in bitcoin today) is through social attack engineering a risk to change adapt the protocol that then introduces a fork that has some people on wrong side of it (US $ coin, quantum resistant coin, it’s a database instead of money coin)

GM

Don’t know what’s crazier to me:

1. Watching the exponential growth of AI

or

2. Watching people enraged by the latest Epstein drop, social outrage, or “insert psyop” while using/measuring in the manipulated money that funds it all.

Pretty sure 2

🎯

Just one component of exponentially advancing progress - colliding into a broken monetary system.
Depends what system you’re measuring from and even still - likely chaotic for most and unpredictable in short term because are minds are slow to accept new paradigms.

Never paid for it.

In my profile - yes and link to why I did it -The corpus was updated automatically today with that same article so the agent will “likely” be more direct when replying. That all being said - many people are there for headlines and sensationalism and won’t read it anyways.

🙏

IYKYK - 😂

😂

Thank you! Each message is “received” when each of us is ready. No right or wrong, better or worse. just is.