It is, you are connecting an individual to the value of the company. Nvidia still owns the same machines and buildings, employs the same number of people, has the same know how, etc... It is not a one man show. He owns less than 5% of the company. If you look at the value of Amazon or Microsoft after the scandals and divorces, it doubled, maybe even tripled. I'm not saying that they are not corrupt or that their behavior should be overlooked or celebrated... I'm just saying that the market reaction is irrational. Or I was saying that until @IntuitiveGuy☯️ pointed out the export of embargoed chips and the risk of fines, regulations and stronger governmental oversight... Since then, it does make sense to me.

Too valuable to be left in the hands of the public sector... That sounds plausible and scary. And this incident (while it still looks fairly benign to me) might be the perfect catalyst.

I think this neatly shows how irrational the human hive mind is, his fucking around has very little tangible impact on the company, yet the value changed dramatically. Did risk and uncertainty shift so significantly to objectively justify the drop? Or is there a fear that his wife will drop $80 billion worth of Nvidia stock on the market at once when the divorce is concluded (are they even getting a divorce?), and the market is already adjusting to that? Or is this just the last straw, and the root of the problem lies in the overvalued tech segment, as the BlackRock guy suggests?

You can always make the city look so nice and appealing. GM & PV!

The JSON is signed, you don't have to trust the relay at all.

Why? The structure isn't enough?

I don't know, I'm left-handed.