Well the idea is to die for a noble cause and not for the sake of usury

Bookmarking this for when I install @GrapheneOS soon @naddr1qqgr...

Tim May just like me fr 😊

@note19pz5z...

Brother and I are printing some @npub17tyke... cases

Just need the rest of the parts to build my own hardware wallet!

Interesting. I know nothing of metaphysics...

Monero is probably the only altcoin that I won't call an outright scam like other altcoins, I actually admire that its users care about privacy, but its clearly in a position to lose against bitcoin. No reason to hold on to it longer than needed to make a transaction, therefore it cannot ever monetize because there's no reason to hold it over bitcoin.

Side note that might interest you, the author quotes norbert weiner in the introduction when talking about power and communication

I think one is primarily rooted in libertarianism and privacy for all, whole the other one is (more) rooted in ethics and transparency for the powerful, relevant passage:

"The two paradigms under examination here are May’s “crypto an-archy” (his term) and Assange’s “crypto justice” (my term). In the chapter on cypherpunk meta-ethics, I juxtapose the moral philoso-phies of May and Assange to highlight the radical differences between their distinct articulations of cypherpunk philosophy. May’s ethics are thoroughly libertarian, grounded in a theory of anarcho-capitalism, while Assange’s ethics are a version of virtue ethics, giving priority to the virtues of justice and courage. In the chapter on cypherpunk theo-ries of the state, I demonstrate how May’s anarcho-capitalist rejection of the state and Assange’s cybernetic theory of the state as a computa-tional network offer competing understandings of government power and surveillance. Some commentators have misinterpreted Assange, claiming that because he is a cypherpunk, he must be a crypto anar-chist (Manne 2011; Di Salvo 2020). As these chapters show, however, crypto anarchy and crypto justice provide radically different philo-sophical foundations for cypherpunk ethics, though each is compati-ble with the cypherpunk call for privacy and transparency."

Currently reading. It's interesting to note that there are essentially two overall cypherpunk paradigms: "crypto anarchy" and "crypto justice". The former was promoted by Timothy May and the latter promoted by Julian Assange.

Not cool enough I guess

But the problem is that there's no one to call a retarded faggot here because everyone on Nostr is automatically based

You developers operate on a wavelength I'll never be able to tune into 😂