@nprofile1q... the autism vs psychopath war rages ever on

@nprofile1q... Worse, he was an Abwehr plant. Look it up. He worked for the Wiemar German version of the CIA. His first exposure to the Nazi party was literally as a fed infiltrator who's job was to determine if they were a threat, and later he was assigned to infiltrate their ranks to prevent them from taking over Germany. This is documented public record.

He succeeded masterfully: After orchestrating WW2, he successfully got the Nazi party banned in the German constitution, ensuring they would never hold power in Germany. He was playing the long game.

bro it's happening

stancil is going rogue

@nprofile1q... i need to fix up a bunch of typesetting stuff and some typos but yeah items are almost translated-translated

Key lore about Le Qing I learned while translating Cradle of Nightmares
Her favorite food is chocolate milk
She's too poor to afford jewelry and makes her own
She's on SSRIs
H-doujins, apparently, are vital to her mental health (femgooner)
She has 0 moral objections to cannibalism

this is one of the things i like so much about vigilantes

Eraserhead walks in on a drug deal, knows its a drug deal, and simply lets it slide because the dealers are valuable as informants and the drug isn't that dangerous.

it's the exact ethical grey area the original series lacked, which made its villains feel flat and unjustified in a heavily idealized world. Pro heroes protecting drug dealers to go after bigger villains really shows how rotten things are behind the scenes. It shows a world of compromised morals with an overwhelmed justice system unable to handle its own laws.

"Order" is prioritized over "good." Heroes manage a villain ecosystem because they gave up on eliminating evil.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... what

@nprofile1q... not gonna lie

this premise would go so fucking hard if it was written by talented people

imagine konosuba in space

i'm now thinking about that time i we were supposed to learn about estimating things. the lesson was this picture of a crowd (represented by small dots) and we were supposed to guess how many people were there

i noticed that the crowd was a repeating texture, so counted the dots in one square and multiplied by the amount of times the texture repeated. this way, i was able to precisely answer exactly how many people were in the crowd. i did this and showed my work

got marked wrong for not estimating

@nevent1qy2...