@VitorPamplona
Nostr's Chief Android Officer - Amethyst Social
Relays (4)
- wss://nostr.wine/ โ write
- wss://vitor.nostr1.com/ โ read & write
- wss://nos.lol/ โ read
- wss://nostr.mom/ โ read & write
Recent Notes
no openclaw. Openclaw is too clunky. This is just a headless instance of claude-code with messages securely replicated over nostr
It was also 3x more expensive in my little test.
1
It will be a shame if we end up finishing the implementation of all the NIPs just in time for AI to implement everything in... 2 days...
1
Yes, was afk for a while, guess they're replacing my original [polls Nip69](https://github.com/toadlyBroodle/nips/blob/zap_polls/69.md). The nostr gatekeepers wouldn't merge it because it was zap-base...
69 is still there btw. But I do think it is way too complicated. Let's hope this improves it.
๐1
Thank you! nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z you still think this is good UX?
We have not implemented yet the warning for when your search relays suck. So, no, it's not good UX.
But it is way better than Amethyst forcing you to use our relay with lots of moderation baked in.
But it is way better than Amethyst forcing you to use our relay with lots of moderation baked in.
โค๏ธ1
This is not a mathematical proof, this is a code design choice.
The proof is that if I don't add that line my code crashes. With it, it works perfectly ๐
NIP-88 incoming!
133โค๏ธ11๐2๐2๐ฅ2โค๏ธ1๐๐ผ1
Help keep one of the few relays that correctly implement NIP-17 alive.
22โค๏ธ2โค๏ธ2๐1๐1๐ค1
