Damus
hodlbod profile picture
hodlbod
@hodlbod

Christian Bitcoiner and developer of the coracle.social nostr client.
Learn more at https://coracle.tools

Relays (4)
  • wss://nos.lol/ โ€“ read & write
  • wss://hbr.coracle.social/ โ€“ read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ โ€“ read & write
  • wss://hodlbod.coracle.social/ โ€“ read & write

Recent Notes

hodlbod profile picture
So who reported this and how reliable is it? Man I wish this would go somewhere but it seems so bogged down at this point
hodlbod profile picture
Sure, it's a chicken/egg thing, I have not problem with us getting hammered with traffic. We're probably just going to fail a few more times before everything is up to snuff
hodlbod profile picture
I'll RFC this too. The original version is here:

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/2194

The main difference between the two versions is mine uses encryption to keep content hidden from the callback server and any other intermediaries until it reaches the user.

I honestly like the simplicity of Vitor's version better, but I think it could be a liability for push servers to be handling potentially access-controlled events in cleartext.

Plus, this architecture really only makes sense for getting events out of relays that implement access control, since for normal ones you can just use REQ or negentropy.

Thoughts?

@nevent1qvz...
hodlbod profile picture
Nostr isn't ready for an influx like this first of all. Relays would fall down, and how would clients handle posts with 30k likes? We need to figure out caching and aggregation strategies that are better than just checking all relays. And unfortunately this is hard to do without centralization. There are lots of unsolved problems, decentralization is hard.