I just want to share my thought, and eventually start a discussion, about this specific matter. I don't usually over react with passive-aggressive unfollowing :)

You are not helping Nostr this way, people will percetive it as dangerous and unfair, they will tell friends to avoid it, and they will simply stay on Facebook/Instagram/X/whatever.

It's better to support Nostr ethos respecting user's privacy, explaining how things work, and possibly sharing a little kindness, since their pain could be real.

It happened several times to njump.me, but for CASM content.
I usually briefly explained that njump is just a viewer for something hosted elsewhere, and then blocked the content.
It's easy to understand that for media, but your case is different both for the nature of the content. and because it seems related to the textual part, so you should highlight to relays architecture, that is a little harder to grasp.
I would ask to a lawyer that know that specific jurisdiction how to manage the issue.

How did you experience that?
Background tabs keep loading, that's the entire reason "open link in new background tab" exists. There could be throttling, not suspension, if a page has been built properly.

Really cool!
I was just thinking to build something like that for the project I talked you about. I really think I'm going to steal it from you.

I'm not a LLMs fan at all, but you are wrong in the majority of what you are saying. LLMs have a great visual analysis capabilities, can play with applications and have huge knowledge about performances, usability and accessibility indicators.
They only have some limits in simulating inaccurate or multiple touch interactions.

Testing only works if developers ask about it, showing some interest, otherwise it's a huge waste of time. I often tried to proactively share suggestions, but they have often been ignored.

The majority of developers prefer to solve "big problems" and make announcements about new features, not get bogged down in tedious details. This off course is lethal for an app that aims to be used by a lot of people.

The exception is when many users complain about the same thing, but this assumes that the app has some recognized value and it is widely used, that is rare.

In any case, there are many crowd testing platforms designed specifically with this goal in mind.

> if you don't have a problem with pasting your nsec

It also supports NIP-55 Android local signers.

Oh, I just skimmed through it, I'll take a closer look later.

I didn't know it existed.
Per device key derivation is interesting, but I don't know how much it is needed in this case.
I want that personal notes are saved on a relay that allows only the author to req them, so the privacy improvement protects just from relay owner's eyes.

In addition: how many derived keys should I take in consideration when subscribing for events? Maybe it's not a problem to use a 50 items list, but it's arbitrary, and this aspect could compromise the UX.