@Ostry
Relays (3)
- wss://nostr.mom/ – read & write
- wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
- wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/ – read & write
Recent Notes
This is so me. 🤣
https://blossom.primal.net/9ab700f764df194a0c8203fa4617a6e67be3994e59b0d4fd0c355a7bc5ff29ae.jpg
Where's the dumpster fire? Here's more of an abusive shitshow.
❤️1
https://blossom.primal.net/0580beb7c60ed02d378c281895b8106d592b5d1bdf2cd8736bdfb608396198df.jpg
That was never a given, was it?
❤️1
@fiatjaf you prly been asked this before, what's your sense on the matter of having clients connect to each relay separately instead of a more decentralized model like irc with a family of relays providing one network of messaging traffic?
I'm trying in my mind to give nostr a place/position, and I feel like the distributed model creates an excessive need for client connections, and for relays coping with huge numbers of incoming connections.
Also, is it easier to miss out on conversations because there are so many individual relays instead of select IRC-esque large hubs?
Am I wrong? Am I exagerating my expectations? Am I misinterpreting this? I am somewhat bugged by this model as if there's a looming longevity/sustainability issue.
I'm trying in my mind to give nostr a place/position, and I feel like the distributed model creates an excessive need for client connections, and for relays coping with huge numbers of incoming connections.
Also, is it easier to miss out on conversations because there are so many individual relays instead of select IRC-esque large hubs?
Am I wrong? Am I exagerating my expectations? Am I misinterpreting this? I am somewhat bugged by this model as if there's a looming longevity/sustainability issue.
This was reason to massively harass me over "not being humble".
You become what you pay attention to.
Dude, srsly? So asshole has been sending directed EMF through my skull in some sick targeted harassment and abuse campaign. It very likely also the cause of severe sleep deprivation years ago. This is not about "attention".
Even though all this text elaborates and illuatrates the point, the *only* thing relevant is 'story', but 'story' is possibly the most disrespectful word that could have been chosen. If you truly unde...
🤨 I'm giving you a chance to defend your position. I am still curious whether you'd convince me.
Even though all this text elaborates and illuatrates the point, the *only* thing relevant is 'story', but 'story' is possibly the most disrespectful word that could have been chosen. If you truly understand this, you should be able to do much better and in particular if you want to relate it to intensity (prly more than longevity), or otherwise — I would claim — you do not understand it.
