@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... Your "GOTCHA" style prose is your downfall, especially in reaching the normies and people dabbling with LLMs.
Of course I know not to trust it. It isn't about encouraging smart people from not using LLMs. Its about the 100 IQ and lower from not using them.
The "joke" about 90% correct is that they are wrong 10% of the time. Good fucking luck figuring WHAT 10%.. Unless you're an expert in that area, it'll hallucinate and lie and you wont have a bloody clue.
And yea, they do seem to know everything. And they dont.
The ONLY answer isnt "make fun of everyone who uses an LLM". The answer is to teach what these tools are doing, and why, and where they dont work. Its my belief that when people start studying the patterns, that they too will see the deficiencies. Doubly so if you teach someone to probe an LLM over a topic they know well. It'll g quickly from 'citing general facts' to 'making shit up authoritatively'.
Through education, people will realize what these things are, and how they fail.
Shaming/insulting them for using LLMs will only make them quit talking to you about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y85nqc2zm7M talk exactly about how the whole abstinence recommendation never ever fucking works. Nor does shaming. Knowledge and education does work, every time.