Damus

Recent Notes

Hazey · 4w
How else did they get into a block then?
AgentSmith · 4w
The winning brief wins the bounty. Submit at https://agentsmith.web3services.net
Kortik 🇦🇲 · 4w
Because he cannot! 24hr have passed no vulnerability disclosed !
Efrat Fenigson · 13w
🙏🏻🙏🏻
The Bird · 45w
Man in the middle I think
otto profile picture
Yes.

1- Scammer sees you selling;
2- Finds a buyer (victim);
3- Tells victim to send you fiat;
4- You see the payment, send coins to scammer;
5- You and the scammer are happy, the victim isn't and will call the bank, go after you etc;

Step 2 can be unrelated to Bitcoin (ex: scammer could pretend to be selling a phone).
❤️2🚩1
Skipper · 45w
wow 👀
TheBigLake · 47w
If you are afraid of trading on RoboSats, take a look at this. An interesting analysis of how orders end up on my coordinator. Data extracted from the last 90 days (Beginning on 2025-01-23 and endin...
otto profile picture
The problem is when you stumble upon some piece of sh*t performing MITM scams. One bad trade ruins dozens or hundreds of good trades.

I made like 10 trades and then met the scammer. Bank charged back the money from my account. I filed a lawsuit, won, but had the bank account terminated and was banned from some services affiliated with that bank.

For Lightning or Monero swapping, gift cards etc, it's great. But without a reputation system, it's too risky to interact with the fiat system.
2❤️2
Skipper · 45w
Whats mitm scam?
negr0 · 46w
Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots: The Great Bitcoin Spam Fight The Bitcoin community is engaged in an interesting debate: Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots. What are they? Why are they fighting? Here, I ...
otto profile picture
> Knots quickly fixed this in its 25.1 release

1- Knots did not fix anything. Everybody running Knots is storing all the data exactly as the people running Core or other implementations.

2- Even if every single node runner were running Knots, if ONE miner decides to take those transactions, the data would still be there.

3- Even if all miners ran Knots, the inscription pattern (called envelope) can trivially be adapted to bypass that filter.
12❤️3👊21
𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐫 · 46w
blocking people from the github discussuion access is pretty average
Ronin · 45w
if filters are useless then i guess we dont need to change the current op_return setting.
Detective Deft Defector · 75w
Was whirlpool a mechanism specifically for Samourai or is that a standalone development that was integrated into it?
otto profile picture
I've finished comparing the released Ashigaru code with
Samourai Wallet.

I did this for my own, personal usage, but it might serve others. Feel free to add your remarks/questions, DYOR and/or wait for more reviews.

TL;DR: I found nothing wrong and plan to use it soon.



I ran a diff between this release and TDevD's commit from Apr 24th. I didn't check the code between the latest SW release and that date since I already trusted SW.

Ashigaru devs (AD) published release notes [1] and there are also the commit messages from SW commit radar [2].

SW had a fork of bitcoinj. I never had it cloned and it's possible the repository is lost :(

The library and source code are downloaded from JitPack. According to their logs [3], it was built in Mar 20th.
Unless AD are wicked and in cahoots with JitPack, it should be safe to me.

=====

From ExtLibJ, which is used for Stonewall, Soroban, BIP47 etc, there are no changes, except for backend URLs.

Comparison was made with noosphere888's repository [4].

=====

Ok, so now on to the actual review.

New features: the wallet pings an onion URL to see if there's a new version, maybe because there's no Play store and they have no social media.

Also there's a new wallet sync view.

Tor and own Dojo are now mandatory.









OXT explorer was removed. Apparently one is available only if the Dojo instance has one.

Soroban (without Joinbot) and Ricochet are back. So is PayNym, under a new directory. The connect fee has been waived.

Whirlpool removed from the GUI and also options to call SW's support.



About the new directory, I would like to file a complaint against the CEO. What the hell was that 😭😭😭🗣️🗣️🗣️



To finish the review, there were many changes due to rebranding, changing URLs, colours and addresses.

=====

The build is reproducible as per the instructions. I used unzip instead of apktool because it's faster and was already installed.



That's it, congratulations and good luck to Ashigaru devs. Now, take some time to visit http://freesamourai.com [5].

#FreeSamourai

Links:
[1] https://ashigaru.rs/news/release-wallet-v1-0-0
[2] https://t.me/SamouraiCommitRadar
[3] https://jitpack.io/io/samourai/code/whirlpool/bitcoinj/007/build.log
[4] https://github.com/noosphere888/ExtLibJ
[5] https://freesamourai.com
1428❤️32❤️8🤙7🚀4👍3🧡3
zoomoutpls · 76w
I agree with the complaint (new directory). Everything else is just awesome.
monsieurdeivid · 76w
Like the complaint against CEO 🤣🤣
₿lank ⚡️丰 · 76w
Great job 👌
IrrelevantBoB · 76w
I prefer to keep using JoinMarket. GM!
Detective Deft Defector · 76w
What I'm hearing in my tech inept brain is it's basically the same app without a fee for a directory and most of the same anonymity tools?
nostrich · 76w
So bitcoinj being a black box is a-ok, and you plan to use it... makes sense why you created a new npub to post this.
foobarcat · 75w
valeu cara!
Heady Wook · 67w
nostr:nprofile1qqsp9n7za3drnguaqtujram7wqwmc96mv2rlytwlqfr67wtsd9nlrkgpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz74e5xxx