Cyph3rp9nk
· 2w
I am not discussing the motivations behind BIP-110.
I am discussing the strategy that was followed.
- It should never have been launched when you knew your client only represented 20% of the network...
I agree with you 100%. For the record , I am running BIP110 from the beginning and will continue although don't see it can succeed. BIP110 is totally forced and making it temporary they fucked it from the start as they make it toothless. From my pov it is totally anti-bitcoin and anti-human to not run at least Knots pre-RDTS or older core at this moment. Also, people need to be aware that trust in Knots is real target here and who knows, maybe even Luke have made a deal with devil (from now on all heroes are dead: just look on Zucco holding hands with Tether guy, Mallers using "Build back better", Andy gives you candy, and even big BIP110 advocate Matthew Kratter was working with mr. Palantir Thiel, our full of Christ Luke is afraid of anti-Christ roman laws, just like Zsabo) to help to implode Knots so any resistance left is old core runners which they will try to ruin with forced upgrade because of some bugs .
I have tried to warn Luke on Twitter about all this shit but I din't use CIA term, but Luciferians (organized as CROWN, not monarchy), because it is much more accurate.
"I would say the CIA has achieved its objective." Yes, they (CIA does shit without MI6) are, and they now have good picture how many people will actually do something. People don't understand that there is nothing random happening in this world regarding revolutions, wars, or stupid BTC price not being reflection of the real markets. So takes like price dumped when core v30 is published are retarded, because if there was no successful capture of Core development and this BIP110 drama, there will be another drama created so people can have their "fake history" why something happened. Just like majority of human history. Just look on Iran vs USA drama and people thinking that those are two opposed sides, but anyone who studied any government is knows that command line for USA is CFR, Iran have SCFR, Russia have RIAC, China have CPIFA, Israel have ICFR, Japan have JIIA ... all getting orders from RIIA (Chatham House). It is all same shit and people don't decide about anything important.
Returning to BIP110. In overall, BIP110 can't cause any chain split (only opposition can organize URSF). But it will for sure make life to people like me that runs routing Lightning nodes and use Bitcoin as daily driver while using Knots -RDTS a much harder. And if it fail, people that supported BIP110 will probably blame LUke, and attack him with his favorite word "Liar" because troubles that BIP110 node runners will have if BIP110 mining hashrate is low are not addressed in full.
This is where node implementations like Start9 can be handy as people can easy switch from Knots -RDTS to Knots pre-RDTS if it became obvious that they live surrounded by static cucks as support of BIP110 is not growing. I will personally switch back to Knots pre-RDTS if there is too little miner support for too long time so I can't make payments or lightning node can't function properly. But I will not abandon Knots even if Luke rage quit.
