A partial eclipse, 20%, on core. And 3% mining on bip110.

The battle begins.

bip-110 is going to diverge because of tx backlog

tx backlog is caused by difficulty adjustment regime

do the math.

here's the tldr on what bip-110 is up against

- current difficulty adjustment regime pretty much guarantees that bip-110 will fail because it will not adjust difficulty and miners will not be able to progress the chain

- changing the difficulty adjustment to a highly tested, robust, and secure dynamic adjustment will allow the block cadence to catch up to spamchain

- once bip-110 sidechain diverges, it's a fork, really, there is no two ways about it

- once it becomes a fork, the opportunity cost of changing the DAA (difficulty adjustment algorithm) becomes a no brainer

i am the only person in the world right now, who has done heavy research into DAAs since the adoption of proof of stake on shitcoin chains. i took what the researchers already did, and i did many experiments, i have tried out two distinct algorithms already, one for parallelcoin, and another for energi.world. i can build sims that let you input any scheme of scenarios that lets the bip-110 chain block cadence catch up and confirm all the pending transactions.

there will be others who will join with me and validate my work. we will build a consensus. the situation demands this exact issue be solved, and there is no two ways about it. if we bring bip-110 block cadence up enough to confirm transactions and clear the mempool, we are in a situation where the chain can properly trade against spamchain

this will also mean that people can switch. the utxo set can re-converge if we act fast. we have about 3 months to stop a full split of utxo set.

what other way is there? play out the scenario. keeping the chains from fully diverging is the race. if bip-110 can hold off divergence we can win.