Damus

Recent Notes

owenkemeys profile picture
Listen up. It is ridiculous that the default custody relationship for newbies is still a trusted 3rd party (who they don't even really know - it's just a faceless corporation).
We should absolutely have solved this ages ago so that the default choice is trustless, robust, user friendly and ON CHAIN (& LN).

Bitcoin is a world where every user can be assumed to have a pocket supercomputer.
We have universal and free access to beyond bank vault level security. Plus timelocks, plus multisig, plus hidden alternate spend paths. When done properly it's more secure than their fiat balance.

Yes key based security is new to most and the unfamiliar is scary. Yes, great companies and products have emerged to address this with hardware and software and services. But, it's almost 2025 and the default position on self custody is still FEAR.
We've fucked up.
techfeudalist · 104w
Please explain how covenants help solve scalability. I’m wondering how these proposals address the uncertainty of fees. It seems to me that restricting payments to a particular address assumes tha...
owenkemeys profile picture
Think from the other direction: covenants are useful not just to restrict your own spending, but mainly because you can prove to a counterparty that you cannot spend it any other way. This removes a layer of trust, that currently we can only solve with multisigs, but with that comes a bunch of interactivity requirements.
🤠1
owenkemeys profile picture
Good analysis, with points I hadn't thought of.

https://www.zherbert.com/bitkey/

The direction doesn't seem very @jack?
What happens when Block gets hacked and all their users KYC, IPs, AND complete on-chain history gets leaked? Subpoenad?
When users with compromised phones blindsign an evil TX, will you repay them, or...?

I get the tradeoffs you’re trying to make, but it seems to be setting people up for trouble? Surely a better UX gently introducing them to address validation etc is better? If not, isn’t this closer to the legacy system than Bitcoin’s ethos?
TK SuitCoin.exe 80HpW · 157w
Looking to help teach about these ways. Stay tuned..
yunginter.net · 157w
you’re overlooking his brother basically being thiel capital for the last decade, I think the Weinstein’s will be some of the last to leave team Elon.
owenkemeys · 158w
You can get there by piecing together the fragments. Start at the bottom layer: cells are intelligent actors that communicate and cooperate toward higher order goals - biologist Michael Levin, eg http...
owenkemeys profile picture
From the other direction, spiritual folks have had the concept of the soul since forever, but it’s obviously hard to put into scientific terms. However-

1. On that Lex podcast above, Levin describes a feature of death that seems to make no evolutionary sense - beings will give up and die when their situation seems hopeless, but in identical situations when they still have hope, it demonstrates they have plenty of energy to fight (example experiment with rats trapped in water, some taught that if they hold on long enough they get rescued). Why ever have ANY instinct to give up if the goal is to perpetuate your genes, surely any cost is worth paying? That does sound a lot like a video game player resetting the game, though…

2. Excellent book by a full skeptic neuroscientist who investigates spirituality/psychic phenomena/pseudoscience mumbo jumbo, and is ultimately brought to accept the evidence suggests the physical plane is not all there is: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/58977909-proof-of-spiritual-phenomena

Could add much more but I’ll leave it there for now
owenkemeys · 158w
From the other direction, spiritual folks have had the concept of the soul since forever, but it’s obviously hard to put into scientific terms. However- 1. On that Lex podcast above, Levin describes a feature of death that seems to make no evolutionary sense - beings will give up and die when the...
HaloKat · 158w
Once you can simulate your own reality, you can simulate others too. In essence, you could create your own matrix and live within it. 

It’s possible that in such a future we no longer require a...
owenkemeys profile picture
This totally misses the wood for the trees!
Either: your consciousness/personality is an emergent phenomenon resulting from the community of cells that make up your body - think like how countries can have a character, or toxic bitcoin maximalists - in which case without the cells there is nothing.
Or: consciousness is something originating outside the body and maybe 3D space itself, you might use the term “soul”, in which case they voluntarily elect to constrain themselves inside physical bodies for some purpose - some say just to experience the universe, or experience struggle and hardship, perhaps to provide more meaningful existence.

Notice how in bitcoin we voluntarily constrain ourselves down from the huge scope of the Wild West internet, into this very limited system, because it gives our interactions more significance, so much so that we can use it as money, the foundation layer of society…
3
HaloKat · 158w
You seem to be very certain about something nobody is certain about. I can’t have a coherent discussion with such arguments.
tigs · 158w
Have you heard of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale ? It might interest you. If you're after a very good video explanation by Michio Kaku. This is great too... https://youtu.be/6GooNhOIMY0
BitcoinBird · 157w
I lean towards the latter as things emerging from the sea of potential need something that binds them. Without a consciousness observing them, they are, at base layer, just that: potential to be something. I forgot the name for the smallest unit we can observe, but at some point there is no distinct...
owenkemeys profile picture
Best web-based front end for my lightning node?
Tried Thunderhub and Ride the Lightning, way too nerdy, need something way closer to the mobile wallet experiences. QR codes, attention to UX etc.
1
Brad Mills · 158w
I never really got Cashu or Fedimint. After a long call with Jeremy Hill and Jonathan Wilkins during our catchup call (I invested in their startup), they explained how they were going to be using Cas...
owenkemeys profile picture
Cos it’s still custodial, just much less bad type of custodial. You’re not transacting sats, but sats IOUs.
Conceptually just like fiat started out, which worked ok until the rugpulls.
That said, the people working on bitcoin ecash are smart, realistic, know its weaknesses and are working to mitigate them.
I think Calle had an idea for provable reserves, which would eliminate the creeping fractional reserve risk.
1❤️2🤙1
moonsettler · 158w
there is custodial that is: - kyc/aml ridden unsafe - permissioned account system - orwellian surveillance nightmare - debased via fractional reserve - gatekept and metered walled garden and there is custodial ecash: - private - either fungible or programmable - accountless and individually permiss...