@Hexaduvo
Lurking
No relay list published yet.
Recent Notes
Maybe the flow is Nostr app (or key holding app to:
sign with selected identity,
the app uses open timestamps to lock that signature into a specific place in time,
the signed file along with the timestamp proof back to the group you’re signing with
Optional: they repeat the process to add their signature
sign with selected identity,
the app uses open timestamps to lock that signature into a specific place in time,
the signed file along with the timestamp proof back to the group you’re signing with
Optional: they repeat the process to add their signature
If I am well-measured, I’d be happy to leave the reply. If I am a jerk, I can delete. My gain, my loss. No platform moderation required.
As a third party reader of the thread, I think I’d rather make my own decisions on who I would want to mute rather than have to depend on the decisions of whoever started the thread. Though I’d like a mode or filter of sorts where I can see that lots of people have muted someone’s post or their entire account.
❤️1🤙1
Gotcha. Yeah, nobody is locked into one particular future! If we set time aside - we could think about all those possible future versions of you coexisting in our minds, each with some probability of being the path you follow. Which will you choose? How will you choose? How much voice do you personally have in the selection?
I know you’re talking about something else here, but I’ll just add that the quantum effect is the same regardless of who the observer is, and my astronomy example is not a quantum effect, just an ambiguity in the little data my example indicates we have about that star and its planets. The result is that multiple different models, each with their own sets of assumptions, come to different conclusions about the planets around the star. I was just saying that the fact that several people form multiple different models of who you are, their differences are due to their limited data rather than you actually being multiple.
I know you’re talking about something else here, but I’ll just add that the quantum effect is the same regardless of who the observer is, and my astronomy example is not a quantum effect, just an ambiguity in the little data my example indicates we have about that star and its planets. The result is that multiple different models, each with their own sets of assumptions, come to different conclusions about the planets around the star. I was just saying that the fact that several people form multiple different models of who you are, their differences are due to their limited data rather than you actually being multiple.