Before * signaling

Core devs who were DEI hires, don’t hold Bitcoin and made changes to the protocol to add use cases like Stablecoins, Brc tokens and even give scammers 100,000btye space to store illicit data permanently on the nodes.

This was the first attack. Not a coincidence all the other attacks came days for mandatory signaling.

Fuk

You can verify the download. You should always do a digital signature verification!!

Consensus says FEDCOIN

Exactly that’s why they paid Core devs to turn it into Ethereum via mit media lab. Thats why Epstien funded Blockstream and they run a cloud mining Ponzi. Thats why core makes DEI hires and fast tracks maintainers that don’t even hold Bitcoin. Thats why @N and Coldcard scammed clients to scare them out of self custody before a possible chain split. They want a smaller chain of honest nodes running bip110.

Rdts is the epitome of decentralization in every way. It’s simply wants BTC to focus on the original telos. MONEY

The state wants it centralized and to control miners and devs

No. I’m just being realistic. The mining pools are centralized and if they don’t listen to 17000 nodes then a chain split will be awesome. I’d love to mine on a chain with zero ties to Epstien. With no control and capture by treasury companies, scams and spammers.

It won’t happen though. It will activate tomorrow

Hope so.

If that’s your LLM good luck 🤣

Not true. There is no need for relay protection in a softfork when we have a POW change.

Go back to playing with your LLM.