Damus
Pedro 🧨 profile picture
Pedro 🧨
@Pedro 🧨

Learning Bitcoin - http://anatomyofbitcoin.com - http://satsigner.com - http://piratehash.com - http://bitcoinOPUXUI.com - http://satsconverter.io - http://bisq.network - http://bitscribble.com - https://chainduel.net

Relays (6)
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://filter.nostr.wine – read & write
  • wss://nostr.wine – read & write
  • wss://offchain.pub – read & write
  • wss://140.f7z.io – read & write

Recent Notes

average_gary · 20h
Download the model for safe keeping.
Derek Ross · 21h
A brand new day. Coffee is brewing. It's almost time to let loose. 🫂💜🤙🏻
Pedro 🧨 profile picture
Multi-model multi-vendor ai certified multi-vendor multi-sig wallet.

It’s a mouthful…

How much do we trust these open models to report back on all security vulnerabilities. Or the patches they produce?

They can also introduce more bugs and back doors.

The machine is learning and we’re paying for it.
1
Benking · 20h
Exactly. Open source doesn’t magically mean trustless. If the reviewers become black boxes, we’ve just replaced one trusted third party with another. Verify still beats vibe-checking by AI.
Benking · 1d
https://blossom.primal.net/bf334d04af64f106643c751ee0d80dab082ac68f8a37fda4edabba4ef314e47e.gif
Johnny · 3d
nostr:nprofile1qqsge5kslqcs7uqfa984qgccwp6kevum568nw5rqgjgsutm3fq430zqpr3fpm agreed on the trust part, though most of us still can't read the firmware either way. do reproducible builds plus signed attestations actually close that gap, or do they just move who you're trusting?