The scientific method was designed to break consensus through falsification. But the institution of science has evolved to optimize for career preservation and funding continuity.

Those two things are in direct conflict. And AI is about to make it worse.

Federal grants go through peer review panels staffed by establishment researchers who fund work that builds on their frameworks. Tenure depends on publications approved by the same gatekeepers.

The result is that only the independently wealthy can afford to pursue heterodox research. Everyone else self censors to survive.

Now add AI to the loop.

Human gatekeeping → biased research → biased training data → biased AI → AI reinforces consensus → funding follows AI → repeat.

Each cycle gets harder to break because the machine gets more authoritative and more efficient at marginalizing dissent.

We are not automating discovery. We are automating orthodoxy.

Obsessing over the American Civil War. Wonder why?

I know I’m preaching to the choir here, but real estate isn’t turning the corner from here.

How can you prove someone would be “less sick” if they received a shot?

Here’s to hoping Oliver Anthony takes it slow. This is the start of something special.
We are here to take back our music, our money, our property, our privacy, and our sovereignty. We can survive without our keepers.

I swear by my life and love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
-John Galt

Mount Rushmore of worst US Presidents…

I’ll start…

Lincoln, FDR…..