I just looked it up, now reporting 40 killed.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/live-blog/live-blog-update/death-toll-school-bombing-iran-raises-40?nid=434266&topic=US%2520and%2520Israel%2520attack%2520Iran&fid=552493

どこにありますか？

September

Ha! Brillliant

Glad I never signed up to Apple and got out of Google 10 years ago! Still trying to convince people to go FOSS, but if I can't news like this may.

An espresso or black coffee is fine after a big evening meal. A large cafe latte is not.

So xcancel in the link stops the traffic being registered at X?

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Here's the problem for me with making war on such vocabulary, it is that these words mean very different things to different people. When I was younger (70s/early 80s) socialism meant the common man against vested interests. Now it seems to mean enforcing dogmatic concepts like transgernderism, and is often equated in the minds of north Americans with Marxism, and by extension Bolshevism. Same with capitalism in the minds of its opponents, it is equated with corporate power and centralization (crony capitalism), which I am sure is not what you are describing (I think capitalism and the drive to "capitalise" are an inate human characteristic). So we end up in this war denouncing "socialism" or "capitalism" when I actually think the problem is much deeper. Sorry, I do not have answers to solve this, I just like questioning things.

Yep, I cannot disagree, but the problem still seems to be born of the tendency towards centralization. "Central banks"

Many socialists too would say, that real socialism has never been tried. But the issue seems to be more about centralization rather than capitalism vs socialism. I think there's an inherent trait in humanities' mentality, that leads it to centralization, to look for leaders etc. And I honestly am not sure how this is easily overcome.