@nprofile1q... やだ

@nprofile1q... 12時前に寝るチャレンジ(無理)

@March 16th, The Hatkeshiator @menherahair :redeyeorb: Oh actually come to think of it, you probably don't know about the 10,000 niggys.
Unfortunately I don't think I have that image.

@nprofile1q... dick-sucking faggot

@menherahair :redeyeorb: @March 16th, The Hatkeshiator

@March 16th, The Hatkeshiator @menherahair :redeyeorb: funi

@menherahair :redeyeorb: That's already the point. Intra-instance communication is whatever, I've been trying to design something that encourages federation.

@March 16th, The Hatkeshiator @menherahair :redeyeorb: Specifically I'm going to have it that when you form a party (tag @dungeonbot with any number of other people), whoever opens the dungeon determines which instance the run occurs on. So the only way to get into another instance's dungeon is to party up with someone from there, this means that you must actually communicate with other instances to acquire mats for crafting. (Probably I'll have trading of some description but that still requires you to communicate with people on the target instance, so it's fine.)

It occurs to me that the logical next step for mats is have it like... 6 different kinds of [stone, wood, etc.], the more of them you combine the stronger the result. That can probably use up a bunch of bits.

@menherahair :redeyeorb: I don't want to penalise instances for having non-participating players.
Like, inactive accounts are one thing, but even if I use MAU for size it's still not great.

@nprofile1q... 鳥のうんこもかわいい

@March 16th, The Hatkeshiator There will be no fags in my game.

@March 16th, The Hatkeshiator [To answer "why not copy D&D classes": Because D&D sucks.]