You have the right mindset.
And yes, Phillip K. Dick was a genius.
Thanks for the book recommendation, I'm downloading it.
https://library.lol/main/ED7E89700FDCEA54EC43C0FD3CE0F522

Ah, yes, they see to be more aware than us of the true nature of time. Animals and plants.

Faster than light travel creates some interesting paradoxes according to General Relativity, like information becoming capable of traveling back and forth in time.
This has become part of mainstream science now, and since the mind can travel faster than light I see no reason why we couldn't observe our own lives in retrospective from the future. Of course maybe not every mind would be able to do it, but intuition, for example, something that we all have experienced at least once in our lives, seems to be pretty close to what such phenomenon would look like.

Yes. According to what I've read it's 3 weeks from one extreme of the known universe to its opposite.

Ah, yes, information, that sounds about right!

Yes, it's infinitely divisible and fungible! Correct!

👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏

Very clearly put, thank you!

Possibly, because the time it takes for a sufficiently advanced civilization to develop a technology like this is just a couple of centuries. Like literally, two hundred years, if we are to believe what we see on the news about UAP's. And there have been advanced civilizations in the past.

Now, in relation to zero-point energy, they call it that, again, only to a property of an underlying fluid, that I prefer to call "ether" (they call it "quantum field").

They spend millions and billions per year trying to find more new quantum "particles", pretending to understand matter better that way.
The reality is that there are no particles at all.
It's always the same fluid vibrating at different frequencies in different directions, creating different kinds of waves.
One fluid vibrating and forming a finite number of individual waves that in turn form what we call "the visible universe".

Now, take that thought with you, keep it in mind, think about it for a while, and then try to use it to better understand your own intuitive knowledge.
Because that tension between "particles" that you perceive, I posit, is in reality the total lack thereof.

Yes. It is not the matrix of spacetime itself, but a property of it.
When we say that "there is zero-point energy (a source of electrons, a "huge cloud" if you will) everywhere", where is this "everywhere" located exactly? This "everywhere" is not constant, it fluctuates, it varies and it can be measured.
Space(time) = "everywhere".
Gravity = gradient in ether's density/pressure.
Zero point energy = extraction of energy from this fluid variable ether.

Therefore the less mass, the more energy available for extraction by this method (ZPE).

This is why I believe that interstellar travel is far easier than currently believed, because the amounts of energy available in the interstellar medium (from its "vacuum") are immense in comparison to what we're used to deal with here on Earth. Because there is where all the ether is concentrated and therefore ZPE becomes immensely more abundant.

Maybe we could build the double resonator one day. This is very interesting!

Awesome!!!

>the thing i'm not describing is the gravitational model i have, which is that there is a huge cloud of electrons around all matter, far more outside, with a net zero or near zero electrical or magnetic moment due to their sheer number

This is pretty much in line with my conclusions. Except I don't call it "huge cloud of electrons", I call it aether.
And its pressure determines the internal velocity of the atoms embedded in it.

One more thing, about the last paragraph - once you achieve negative mass time travel becomes feasible.

Interesting!
About punching objects around: instead of brute force think how Nature would do it.
I think it's better to feed a process that increasingly reduces mass, in a loop, or a vortex more precisely.
Think exponentially.

Please feel free to hop in our chat room whenever you like: https://chat.gravimatrix.net

What you describe sounds more like a scalar weapon.
They do require a lot of energy, and they may temporarily create matter.