Get a gun

What does miner signally have to do with consensus? I thought nodes were supposed to make the rules. Guess not on this chain...

What an opportunity for new content creators that can do tutorials on how this will all get set up. What wallets/clients to use, how to mine, what hardware/software, pooling mining set ups, how to mix/not mix coins between Corecoin and Bitcoin, node set up with/without start9, ect. I hope people like Paul Lamb will come help with that. Or maybe we see a whole new group.

Are you mining on Corechain or Bitcoin?

Me too!

Just by another one I guess haha. What a first world view. Wouldn't it be great if a poor family in Guatemala could be self sovereign and run a node too? Wouldn't it be great they could escape government debasement and further decentralize the network?
I wouldn't deter the HF angle. I think it's worth while engaging with the idea that it's actually 5 mining pools forked off and decided the direction of Bitcoin in the face of 20,000 node runes. It was only 20% and not a majority, even though I'm not claiming the system is some kind of democracy, that's something to chew on. What if we had 80% of nodes running rdts? Would that have even changed the outcome? Seemed like most core people celebrated on the first non-signalling block. Is it really ant pool that decides the fate of the network?
I do still support actively stirring the ship within the legacy chain as well. I think supporting the HF and fixing it from within with bips are not mutually exclusive positions, especially because it's an airdrop.
I do believe most reasonable people in Bitcoin want to fight spam, and I'm willing to accept that bip 110 was not good enough. I personally really liked the CAT idea.

Agree. Support the movement on multiple fronts. Continue to support the HF and see where it goes. We can also introduce BIPs to mend the culture and write the ship. Understand why we only had 20% in support and adjust while maintaining the same monentary maxi principles. I for one was really interested in the CAT. Maybe that can get more traction. Maybe we are fucked and even with 60% in support of a BIP isn't enough and the miners, big Bitcoin, ect is in charge, but I'm still willing to keep fighting because this project is too important

Do u run a node or do u use somebody else's? Spam makes it more expensive to run a node so yes it does limit people around the world to use Bitcoin as money today in a sovereign way.

I agree. And I would add that we can support the HF and have others stay on legacy and propose other bips to take back the culture and the projects direction. It may fail, but with a project so important, I think it's worth a shot