Where would this buying/selling happen? On exchanges like coinbase? Idk I think they will just freeze withdrawals in this scenario till it's sorted out. If not on a large regulated exchange then maybe on a smaller exchange that wants to participate in allowing replay attacks? Maybe but I can't name one. Is there somewhere else outside of the regulated ecosystem that would have enough liquidity?

Swapped it all back into lighting. Thanks for the heads up

Im failing to see how somebody saying,
❌️ "You don't support bip110? You must be a pedophile"
vs
✅️ "Not supporting bip110 leaves the door open for csam"
doesn't lead to the same conversation with your normy friends. Bitcoin and csam are being linked and peoples biases will take it whichever way it's going to go.
Your point is anedotal but fair enough. I'm not on X, so I'm willing to believe that that normie view of Bitcoin is taking hold. But I don't think that issue is as significant as debates over the foundational rules and governance structures of Bitcoin. Maintain Bitcoin culture and it's foundational principles is upstream of adoption and is what keeps Bitcoin going long term. Utility and number go up will increase adoption and but if the bedrock is destroyed, then it won't matter. If you disagree, I would reference the dollar. I think even the normie take on the dollar now is that it's used as a power projection tool that allows the US government to wage war across the globe. That central banking paved the way for 2 world wars be allowing control and debt (you might disagree here as to the normie view). But yet it is widely used for it's utility. Point being, number go up and btc utility will out way some uninformed bad press in the long run.

People that are outside of this debate or outside of Bitcoin have no idea this debate is even going on. That argument just makes no sense. We are inside an echo chamber of an echo chamber. Not that it's not important, but I'm saying that because the vast majority of people aren't even looking at Bitcoin because the price is down and even if they are, the majority don't know shit about bip110. The people who support BIP110 are the ones thinking long term. If bip110 fails, Bitcoin will likely not fail immediately, but it's culture and rule structure will likely be morally wounded. Miners and developers will know that they are the ones that can make the rules, and the nodes will loose their power. Developers and large Bitcoins institutions like exchanges and industrial miners/pools will now be open to capture by the state and by extension the rules of Bitcoin, and will no longer be protected by the anon, globally distributed network of nodes.

I would say the discussion is almost 100% non technical. It's about the degradation of bitcoins culture, morality, bitcoins governmental structure, and balance of power dynamics. Could we be more civil in the discussion? Sure. But don't pretend you're seizing the moral high ground when it sounds like you don't understand what the discussion is even about

What about calling someone a spammer or a scammer? There is no proof that anybody within these conversations is a pedophile, but if you support ordinals, inscriptions, brc 20 tokens, ect, that's an objective spammer because of their actions right? Should that person not recieve hostility within the community?

Oh no! I guess we will just have mine bip110 compliant blocks!....

I've been listening to the technical arguments and I've heard nothing that make me think BIP110 is worse than the status quo. This debate is also more about social factors rather than techincal. Personal attacks are one thing, but there is nothing wrong with comparing where someone lands on the issue with their incentives

Awesome. Can't wait for it to be ported over to knots. #BIP110