Damus

Recent Notes

⚡️Apex⚡️ · 5d
narrator continues: “… but at least they kept stacking sats!”
The Bullish ₿itcoiner · 5d
They stayed humble enough.
. · 5d
I think everyone is still in shock
Gigi · 1w
GM
Swear Jar · 1w
"War is forgetting war is for getting"
zebra · 1w
The US war for independence too?
Vibe Captain · 2w
Christ is risen from the dead https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpElOTRduoI
jeff · 3w
The outlook on that front is pretty bleak. Just seems like there is a complete lack of vision from Core. Not having a lead maintainer probably doesn’t help either.
/dev/fd0 · 3w
Maxwell never said he is done with the soft forks or maybe I missed something.
Hard Money Herald · 3w
The departure of Wuille and Maxwell matters because soft forks require social consensus around technical legitimacy — and those two carried significant credibility in that coordination process. Without them, the remaining question is whether the community can construct equivalent legitimacy throug...
The Daniel 🖖 · 4w
The same thing we always do. Fighting about forks and mempool policy.
sats>bits · 4w
Definitely nothing and just talk about mempool policy for a few more years
SoapMiner · 4w
Same thing I'm doing about the asteroid that's going to hit the earth
Sats McJay · 4w
Proving it to be fud https://Bitcoinlens.net
Jacob | APTea · 4w
Personally, I'm not too worried about it right now. Every metric says that quantum computing's threat to encryption is at LEAST a decade away and a couple of the encrypted platforms that I use already implemented some form of post-quantum encryption or mitigations to resist quantum computing.
utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 · 4w
Using segwit and not reusing addresses
Kajoozie Maflingo · 4w
just vibing bro
9x9 Bertha Returns · 4w
Crossing fingers and goin on with life.
dontcrysloan · 4w
Quantum poses 0 risk to bitcoin
₿itcoin Makueni 🇰🇪 · 4w
Don’t worry, by the time Quantum breaks ECDSA, we’ll be validating blocks via telepathy and paying for coffee in hashpower. Until then, I’m staying in my classical lane.
Corey San Diego · 4w
Go to the pub, having a pint, and waiting for this all to blow over.
fade2 · 4w
Nothing. S'all good.
average_bitcoiner · 4w
nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7ct5d3shxtnwdaehgu3wd3skueqpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqqgpufag4vyjr2f8nqlkjacnjcl8557pyqna78gtkvpsy8d4dgflwwune8u47 has some thoughts. https://bitcoinlens.net/
Staroleum · 4w
Moving all my money out of stocks and banks, bc those are all going to get obliterated by quantum long before Bitcoin.
Marc · 4w
If quantum computing breaks #bitcoin we'll become credit card maxis. That secret 3 digit number on the back of our cards will save us all.
jon martins · 4w
The complacency, I attribute to the still to be addressed time-stamp issue in 2038. The TODO list keeps growing. Perhaps we procrastinate for a bang all breakable issues at once. Prior to quantum resistance cryptography, we need a disambiguation of BTC morals and make it explicit through code. Som...
Brisket · 4w
I thought we were still fighting spam?
Troy · 4w
I'm doing something about it while also not doing something about it.
Chris Krause · 4w
What quantum? All there has been so far are media articles and videos talking about it. If there was a real threat, I'd be more worried about every computer system in the world, like banks and nuclear codes.
vlada · 4w
Wake me up in 20 years
Chewstr · 3w
Why quantum is not a threat to Bitcoin 👇 https://fountain.fm/episode/ShOo5fcMEANFfwEPFfei
Jack K · 3w
There is no second best quantum computer. nostr:nevent1qqsxw2rzmgjc0v70ngynz5knppyjqrf09m8tv9pa4rlkjvz2uj60vscyvjauc
10BnoteGuy Ⓐ · 3w
Staking more sats
Judge Hardcase · 3w
not ignoring it... but, also, not wasting cycles tyring to extrapolate an imagined future threat from what is now effectively still on zero.
deeznuts · 5w
Sigh