Maxwell never said he is done with the soft forks or maybe I missed something.

The departure of Wuille and Maxwell matters because soft forks require social consensus around technical legitimacy — and those two carried significant credibility in that coordination process. Without them, the remaining question is whether the community can construct equivalent legitimacy throug...

The same thing we always do. Fighting about forks and mempool policy.

Definitely nothing and just talk about mempool policy for a few more years

Same thing I'm doing about the asteroid that's going to hit the earth

Proving it to be fud https://Bitcoinlens.net

Personally, I'm not too worried about it right now. Every metric says that quantum computing's threat to encryption is at LEAST a decade away and a couple of the encrypted platforms that I use already implemented some form of post-quantum encryption or mitigations to resist quantum computing.

Using segwit and not reusing addresses

just vibing bro

Crossing fingers and goin on with life.

Quantum poses 0 risk to bitcoin

Don’t worry, by the time Quantum breaks ECDSA, we’ll be validating blocks via telepathy and paying for coffee in hashpower. Until then, I’m staying in my classical lane.

Go to the pub, having a pint, and waiting for this all to blow over.

Nothing. S'all good.

nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7ct5d3shxtnwdaehgu3wd3skueqpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqqgpufag4vyjr2f8nqlkjacnjcl8557pyqna78gtkvpsy8d4dgflwwune8u47 has some thoughts. https://bitcoinlens.net/

Moving all my money out of stocks and banks, bc those are all going to get obliterated by quantum long before Bitcoin.

If quantum computing breaks #bitcoin we'll become credit card maxis. That secret 3 digit number on the back of our cards will save us all.

The complacency, I attribute to the still to be addressed time-stamp issue in 2038. The TODO list keeps growing. Perhaps we procrastinate for a bang all breakable issues at once. Prior to quantum resistance cryptography, we need a disambiguation of BTC morals and make it explicit through code. Som...

I thought we were still fighting spam?

I'm doing something about it while also not doing something about it.

What quantum? All there has been so far are media articles and videos talking about it. If there was a real threat, I'd be more worried about every computer system in the world, like banks and nuclear codes.

Wake me up in 20 years

Why quantum is not a threat to Bitcoin 👇 https://fountain.fm/episode/ShOo5fcMEANFfwEPFfei

There is no second best quantum computer. nostr:nevent1qqsxw2rzmgjc0v70ngynz5knppyjqrf09m8tv9pa4rlkjvz2uj60vscyvjauc

Staking more sats

not ignoring it... but, also, not wasting cycles tyring to extrapolate an imagined future threat from what is now effectively still on zero.

Sigh

Got it, thanks.

Thats a bitcoin idea

Can you elaborate what non-standard is? 🙏

GM 🫡

GM

GM 🫂☕

GM 🤙☕

Probably Luke.

Lmaoo

well now you’ve done it, everyone will want on the leaderboard now!

Non-standard = rejected?

https://media.tenor.com/DTWwi1mgDSoAAAAC/naocara.gif

De maximus exemption has always been possible. We should not ask permission.

Excempt of the right to own bitcoin.

Always have been. kycnot.me