I did not understand the whole comment brother. But I think the ummah will have to radicalize more in order to appear as an actor again. What i mean is to radicalize in a non-coercive / non-statist way. The fall of isis was an important step in the sunni part of the world. Now if the fall of the other so called islamic state in iran happens, my prediction is that this new situation will open up the way for a new form of radicalisation. My view is that both isis, irgc etc are just manifistations of statism.. like israel (which is peek of statism).

Taghut is a fascinating concept that is as precise as it is multifaceted—originating from the linguistic root of 'transgressing rightful boundaries,' it bridges theology, psychology, and political philosophy by exposing how anything from human ego and false idols to tyrannical systems can usurp supreme authority

National interests align because they all work for the taghut.

Maybe we should do a podast in which we read that article and discuss it.

Who said that it is a problem. It is one of many blessings of God. تسخير الانعام is not less than rebotics for that time. Still the Quran views it as a blessing.

You want me to point to a muslim scholar who addressed what exactly?

@alp i will tell you how it fits to that. ابو مريم agrees that the this western culture is the 'dominant' culture within its framework we should remain. that, to me, is another reason why SAIF suffers from an intellectual deficiency. For a genuinely radical Alternative Islamic Future, we possess our own framework, language, and style—and we can develop them further. We do not need to adhere to a western philosophy that carries its own nonsensical problems, ranging from historical theological debates over trinity, to long-standing tensions between church and state, to contemporary post-humanism and anti-humanism. Their reliance on contemporary trends like kpop is just a strange attempt to appear appealing.
Breaking free of this entire paradigm should be the sole aim of the entire movement.