InshaaAllah soon when we meet online or offline

This "core critique" is part of the problem. The west suffers from a paradoxical aversion to markets and technology. This has manifested across ideologies like marxism, socialism, and certain strains of right-wing thought. Through the lens of the Quran and the stories of the prophets a clearer diagnosis is: the root problem lies in disbelief in God (lack of trust and "tasleem" in God and instead allegiance to Taghut—the coercive tyrant, the state, or self-wirship of the individual عبادة الذات . These problems have reached the islamic world through emulating of the west.

"Modernity and cybernetics have locked humanity into a mechanized, degenerative timeline (Guenon, Heidegger, Wiener, Baudrillard)."

This is one main part of SAIF that shows a western-centric approach. This deeply problematic relationship with technology and markets that western philosophers have is a main part of the unnecessary western baggage that never convinced me when I was studying here in Europe. Thanks to the Quran and to some degree Rothbard, I understood why mainstream western philosophers have developed this baggage. The critique of technology and the markets is wanted by the banking and state elites, and their intellectual allies (the well-known philosphers).
That SAIF is, in a way, still trapped in this baggage remains strange to me.

I am fine with being west (asia) centric. West asia has mecca, medina, alquds, bagdad and damscus. Places that gave birth to agriculture, writing, monotheism, technology, the market and many other cool stuff that the west either does not understand (monotheism, technology) or missmanages (agriculture, market) till today. What is so important to understand in a western philosophy that produces coninuous genocides and nihilsm on an industrial scale?

The Quran is a pro technology book. It begins with ebracing the technology of writing in "iqra"

This list definitly lacks some important works, like these of rothbard and alghazali. And it also has some marxist stuff that can be eliminated. I am not interested in ai giving me a thread. I would like SAIF to explain why that list and not any other. But if there is no interest in that then its also fine.

​I don't see a cohesive thread in this literature list. Can you describe this thread that makes it usefull to read this combination of writings.

For me as a muslim the west is the perifery.

Maybe we should do a podast in which we read that article and discuss it.

I think SAIF needs to develop its ideas within the islamic framework. I think this would be much more interesting than trying to use the "western" framework. We should understand european philosophy and concepts as a contiuation of the
مغضوب عليهم والضالين
This whole roman empire trinity ideology and the different modern european answers to it, are of no real use for us. It just shows that taghutism in the catholic, protestant or modern and postmodern atheist manifestations are a problem and dont offer tools for us to go forward.