> Nobody is actually against Bitcoin having spam filters
You state an opinion as fact.
you can't talk for "everyone"

if liberals or conservatives are sensible ... fine.
If they are retarded and believe in evil shit ... they are dead to me.

is it really that interesting ? @primal has an amazing UI and it's convenient. If we need to move to something else we can (since we own our keys). Why put yourself through any frustration when you don't need to ?

They don't want you to believe them.
They want you to believe a court of law once all the evidence has been presented and evaluated.
Anything said at this point by any party is just performative.

you're a grifter.. plain and simple.

> The dehumanization of a very specific minority group of people
She doesn't dehumanize any group of people
she simply says that this group of people (A) is not the same as group of people (B) .. which offends group of people (A).
If you can't distinguish between causing people offense and dehumanizing then you've got a cognitive issue.

Rowling is none of these things. Instead of just saying shit, show evidence.

> Knots is a minor fork of Core.

How do you know, have you reviewed it ?

A few things come to mind
1. backups and DR
2. automation (IaC, scripted deployment, templates etc).
3. more bitcoin/nostr related deployments
4. nested virtualization for some more "lab stye" stuff which won't impact the production systems.
5. expansion of my media streaming to include automated show downloads based on a netflix-like algo.

I've got a ton of ideas, i just need to find the time :)

i'll pledge 100k sats for a good guide which meets @Nunya Bidness requirements above.

If you reframe your life through the above... your current situation and the reasons for it completely change. This is causing some pretty deep introspection @HODL, damn you :)