@regenera
Relays (1)
- ws://192.168.1.65:7000/ – write
Recent Notes
Also check out the Common Lisp Portable Perl Compatible Regular Expression library.
https://edicl.github.io/cl-ppcre/#create-scanner2
https://edicl.github.io/cl-ppcre/#create-scanner2
You should've included references to the original source, I thought you wrote the text.
Even worse, the videos in your posts were not from the original post. I thought they were very biased and unfair. I consider the last video in particular (it seems to be a deep faked voice) to be a thinly veiled incitement to hate.
Shame!
Even worse, the videos in your posts were not from the original post. I thought they were very biased and unfair. I consider the last video in particular (it seems to be a deep faked voice) to be a thinly veiled incitement to hate.
Shame!
If "some jerk" deletes my post, it wastes my time, and will cause me to reply less in the future (to everyone else too), that's the "chilling effect" I was thinking about.
Ultimately, I think the poster/replier should own their own notes (undeletable), that's like a basic principle of nostr.
I tend to agree with @DanConwayDev that reports (kind 1984) seem to be the best way to do this. I can reply to you, and you can tag my reply as low value/spam, and other readers (or their clients) can decide for themselves.
Ultimately, I think the poster/replier should own their own notes (undeletable), that's like a basic principle of nostr.
I tend to agree with @DanConwayDev that reports (kind 1984) seem to be the best way to do this. I can reply to you, and you can tag my reply as low value/spam, and other readers (or their clients) can decide for themselves.
I'm using a poor translation from Spanish so I may not be reading the post correctly, but I thought the explanation was pretty reasonable although I do not understand Fediverse culture.
It sounds like Fediverse users expect their conversations to be private and constrained by some terms of service (specific to each Fediverse node?). Are their posts made public, or only gated behind logins like a private forum? Having public posts that are constrained may be incompatible with the natural tendency of how information flows.
About the issue of mostro's keys - we've briefly discussed this in the past, but I now wonder if it's possible for Mostro to share the relevant private keys with the original profile owners on demand (although I'll need to brush up on HD security - how/will key derivation need to be hardened here to avoid revealing all keys)?
If possible, this is still not ideal given that Mostro will continue hold the shared private key (and needs to be trusted), but at least the original profile can now also post on nostr (maybe gradually migrate to a new more secure key pair). Mostro can also update its bridging rules for that particular profile (eg it can stop mirroring posts or delete them etc). I'm just "brainstorming ideas while ignorant" here...
It sounds like Fediverse users expect their conversations to be private and constrained by some terms of service (specific to each Fediverse node?). Are their posts made public, or only gated behind logins like a private forum? Having public posts that are constrained may be incompatible with the natural tendency of how information flows.
About the issue of mostro's keys - we've briefly discussed this in the past, but I now wonder if it's possible for Mostro to share the relevant private keys with the original profile owners on demand (although I'll need to brush up on HD security - how/will key derivation need to be hardened here to avoid revealing all keys)?
If possible, this is still not ideal given that Mostro will continue hold the shared private key (and needs to be trusted), but at least the original profile can now also post on nostr (maybe gradually migrate to a new more secure key pair). Mostro can also update its bridging rules for that particular profile (eg it can stop mirroring posts or delete them etc). I'm just "brainstorming ideas while ignorant" here...