Damus

Recent Notes

JeffG · 58w
I tend to agree. Unfortunately it'll be up to clients to implement this well. I would love to see NIP-04 go away completely and NIP-17 only be used in very low risk environments. Once we get broad ...
regenera profile picture
Have you thought about NIP 46 Nostr Remote Signing? It uses NIP 44 for encrypting messages between client (programs) and signers (programs).

And, by my simplistic understanding, that is just NIP 4 with a different encryption algo, but otherwise equivalent ECDH and similar metadata profiles.
Bitman · 66w
This was adapted from a recent speech delivered at the Property and Freedom Society conference in Bodrum, Turkey, by Jayant Bhandari.
regenera profile picture
You should've included references to the original source, I thought you wrote the text.

Even worse, the videos in your posts were not from the original post. I thought they were very biased and unfair. I consider the last video in particular (it seems to be a deep faked voice) to be a thinly veiled incitement to hate.

Shame!
Tim Bouma · 66w
If I am well-measured, I’d be happy to leave the reply. If I am a jerk, I can delete. My gain, my loss. No platform moderation required.
regenera profile picture
If "some jerk" deletes my post, it wastes my time, and will cause me to reply less in the future (to everyone else too), that's the "chilling effect" I was thinking about.

Ultimately, I think the poster/replier should own their own notes (undeletable), that's like a basic principle of nostr.

I tend to agree with @DanConwayDev that reports (kind 1984) seem to be the best way to do this. I can reply to you, and you can tag my reply as low value/spam, and other readers (or their clients) can decide for themselves.
Tim Bouma · 66w
If I am well-measured, I’d be happy to leave the reply. If I am a jerk, I can delete. My gain, my loss. No platform moderation required.
Alex Gleason · 67w
I don't know how many times I have to say: "it's the same for the whole Fediverse". If these guys win, the Fediverse is doomed. https://angelesbroullon.gitlab.io/entredragonesypinguinos/2025/01/01/202...
regenera profile picture
I'm using a poor translation from Spanish so I may not be reading the post correctly, but I thought the explanation was pretty reasonable although I do not understand Fediverse culture.

It sounds like Fediverse users expect their conversations to be private and constrained by some terms of service (specific to each Fediverse node?). Are their posts made public, or only gated behind logins like a private forum? Having public posts that are constrained may be incompatible with the natural tendency of how information flows.

About the issue of mostro's keys - we've briefly discussed this in the past, but I now wonder if it's possible for Mostro to share the relevant private keys with the original profile owners on demand (although I'll need to brush up on HD security - how/will key derivation need to be hardened here to avoid revealing all keys)?

If possible, this is still not ideal given that Mostro will continue hold the shared private key (and needs to be trusted), but at least the original profile can now also post on nostr (maybe gradually migrate to a new more secure key pair). Mostro can also update its bridging rules for that particular profile (eg it can stop mirroring posts or delete them etc). I'm just "brainstorming ideas while ignorant" here...
PABLOF7z · 67w
they've always been case sensitive they imply the same thing, so using lower/upper case helps convey the meaning uppercase is root, lowercase is parent A/a E/e I/i P/p...