2022: Bear markets are for building.
2026: Bear markets are for dunking on Sailor.

I haven't listened to a Saylor interviews for some time now, but I feel like every interview I've watched with him he says at least one retarded thing.

Last interview I watched, he seemed to think bitcoin was centralized because developers could just merge code at will, and because of that we shouldn't support them financially, because ossification would be preferred.

He does seem to learn and change his tune, at least early on. I have mad respect for that though.

You say "overwhelming consensus", but by whom? If most miners chose 444, non compliant blocks would be discarded by them, and your core node would go with the longest chain, no? If that was the case you would need something like a URSF to force a split, right?

I want the tokens or a prediction market so I can see the actual consensus. Something more sybil resistant than loud twitter users/bots.

This is starting to feel a lot like the block size war, not on content, but by the type of people who support each side, and their arguments.

Back then it was.
x: bigger blocks will lower fees
y: not long term and it's a bad way to scale
x: fuck you, you want high fees.

Would be cool if you could have tokens for each side as in 2017, but I guess that's not possible when it's a soft fork that's not guaranteed to split, right?

The bitcoin dominance candle was pretty wild. Too bad it didn't stay that way.