@Stefan Eissing
curl maintainer, protocol droid, likes to code.
"Nobody has any idea what is actually going on."
Relays (1)
- wss://relay.ditto.pub – read & write
Recent Notes
I think we need to replace „Homo Sapiens“ with a better fitting name.
Any suggestions?
Any suggestions?
1
@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... not by me, no. maybe ask on the dev list?
I did not follow LE completely, but isn't the current chain a temporary thing?
I did not follow LE completely, but isn't the current chain a temporary thing?
@nprofile1q... The sad thing is that these "security researchers" might actually believe the are doing the world a service.
If a libcurl application does the following several steps in the API and connects to 2(!) RTSP servers that use digest authentication and the second server is run by a malicious agent and the same easy handle is used and...
Sure, dude...
Sure, dude...
Copilot Users Bill Awareness Month when?
Just ask the AI for what you want and Meta engineering might give it to you!
https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/1/hackers-simply-asked-meta-ai/#atom-everything
https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/1/hackers-simply-asked-meta-ai/#atom-everything
Interested in a Mythos scan?
„Kindly note that Anthropic states that individuals chosen to participate are a) ideally US-based, and b) subject to passing a security check.“
Maybe not.
„Kindly note that Anthropic states that individuals chosen to participate are a) ideally US-based, and b) subject to passing a security check.“
Maybe not.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq7qes6mstpcsn6rg3w9fwnsau68sw9h9nga9zjy3htmegg27na6wsjd3n63 well I just wrote a rant about this. How can I react to mistakes made with or using AI...
@nprofile1q... It depends on the situation. If your boss drop LLM output into your inbox and think that is the way to go, you are probably very limited.
If a random person drop such a thing into your project, you can refuse to process it without further work by the submitter.
I experience LLM output as part of being a maintainer. And a FOSS project should not feel obligated to accommodate such behavior, IMO.
I do not care what tools someone uses. I care how we communicate and collaborate.
If a random person drop such a thing into your project, you can refuse to process it without further work by the submitter.
I experience LLM output as part of being a maintainer. And a FOSS project should not feel obligated to accommodate such behavior, IMO.
I do not care what tools someone uses. I care how we communicate and collaborate.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq7qes6mstpcsn6rg3w9fwnsau68sw9h9nga9zjy3htmegg27na6wsjd3n63 so in other words ' please send me the prompt ' ? would that be acceptable ?
@nprofile1q... No. The prompt could be "Find a security vulnerability in #curl".
I'd want to know *what exactly* the submitted LLM output found and why it is a vulnerability (and not some bug).
In the reporters words. To make sure they read it. If they did not read/understand it, it is not a communication.
I'd want to know *what exactly* the submitted LLM output found and why it is a vulnerability (and not some bug).
In the reporters words. To make sure they read it. If they did not read/understand it, it is not a communication.
Hot take: They should make movies for grownups.
@nprofile1q... I am waiting for this since my puberty wore off.😌
When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it.
Instead, I ask the sender to summarize the novella in their own words, because I do not have the time, unless they explain to me why it‘s worthwhile.
My advice: do the same. Deflect, politely, LLM dumps. Let‘s make this a conversational norm.
Instead, I ask the sender to summarize the novella in their own words, because I do not have the time, unless they explain to me why it‘s worthwhile.
My advice: do the same. Deflect, politely, LLM dumps. Let‘s make this a conversational norm.
2