Damus
a source familiar with the matter profile picture
a source familiar with the matter
@a source familiar with the matter

<script src="https://pastebin.com/embed_js/TstHh0VL"></script>

Relays (5)
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net/ – read
  • wss://relay.nostr.band/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.einundzwanzig.space/ – read & write

Recent Notes

Jeff Swann · 6d
It would certainly be difficult to believe that material things are what make you important and also not be a fairly empty and self loathing sort of person.
Operation Libertas · 1w
That Marine didn’t even fight back and he still whooped Sen Sheehy’s ass #NoOneWantsToFightForIsrael https://blossom.primal.net/eda8cc1b8fd8af9b1052f3e43557c9222bd4c0d461f9936c4ac8960fa1a4ef91.jp...
a source familiar with the matter profile picture
This whole thing is such a libtard moment to me...

He could be standing up yelling about how much he loves tacos and they're gonna remove him from the hearing.
If he wedges his arm between a door and the frame so they can't drag him out, there's a risk it's going to get broken.

I say this despite agreeing with his actual point completely.
The US seems to be subservient to Israel, probably due to weird and improper influence (blackmail, threats of assassination, etc).
Andrew M. Bailey · 1w
Which Western intellectuals do you have in mind? The ones I find most insightful would agree with you that there’s an objective world, knowable, etc.
a source familiar with the matter profile picture
Virtually all of them but with special attention to Plato, Kant, and by extension virtually all modern Western philosophy:

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-transcendental-idealism/

> In the first edition (A) of the Critique of Pure Reason, published in 1781, Kant argues for a surprising set of claims about space, time, and objects:
> Space and time are merely the forms of our sensible intuition of objects. They are not beings that exist independently of our intuition (things in themselves), nor are they properties of, nor relations among, such beings.
> The objects we intuit in space and time are appearances, not objects that exist independently of our intuition (things in themselves). This is also true of the mental states we intuit in introspection; in “inner sense” (introspective awareness of my inner states) I intuit only how I appear to myself, not how I am “in myself”.
1🤙1
Andrew M. Bailey · 1w
I think Kant was out to lunch on that. So do lots of intellectuals I know, and read, and find most insightful. You might want to expand your reading habits, if it feels to you like “virtually all modern Western philosophy” follows Kant in this respect!
Sovereign Being · 1w
https://youtu.be/4iE-1VQ7RJE
a source familiar with the matter profile picture
Good book; I read it and was (mostly) persuaded.

The book presents (IMO) strong evidence that the US nuclear bombings of Japan were fake.
The onset of symptoms, the observations made immediately after the blast, and some details of the "Manhattan Project" suport the Hoax theory in my view.

I think the book presents little evidence that later bombs (as seen in purported test footage) are fake.
1👍1
Sovereign Being · 1w
Yeah it's possible, but I still lean towards them not existing. I think the true weapons they are hiding are way more advanced. Besides, I'd rather a swift nuke than a torturous biological agent.
Neal · 1w
seeming paradoxes about necessary relations.