@falsefaucet
554413
bitcoin is for enemies
blessed are those who plant trees under whose shade they will never sit
Relays (3)
- wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
- wss://nostr.mom/ – write
- wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/ – read
Recent Notes
People gambling on how many car pass through an intersection.
What have we become.
What have we become.
4
21 million coins, shifting hands over 16 years.
Pay attention.
https://blossom.primal.net/3a79c0b8c8210469359116e7799cb644c7a8aa0f988c4be63af639280401d4ea.mp4
Might be a dumb question but isn't very possible some of the coins are in private business, not ones publicly traded, therefore they don't need to do forms etc.
How is the individual holder percentage determined? Just coins not 'lost and satoshi' or publicly announced owned by a company?
Is it using bitcointreasury?
How is the individual holder percentage determined? Just coins not 'lost and satoshi' or publicly announced owned by a company?
Is it using bitcointreasury?
I think your surface level observation is accurate lol
But we can still wonder why they would make this sort of editorial choice.
my first instinct is the nancy guthrie kidnapping/whatever it is, heard there was ransoms sent demanding 'crypto' i assume thats bitcoin or monero if criminal has any brain.
so could be relevant for that.
also id be interested to see what other article the author has written in regards to this general topic..
and how the 'public relations' is received depend on the audience. privacy advocates could interpret coverage of this topic as positive, if it highlights privacy aspects of the asset.
to the average person, i still think this would be viewed as negative pr. im assuming the article will contain references to dark market purchases, will almost certainly mention silk road, and various ransomware/ person ransoms and scams.
everyone hates scammers, like LEGIT scammers.
I guess i would say this is status quo, they are framing a particular open source monetary network as dangerous, and criminally adjacent.
but yes anyone got a paywall free link
so could be relevant for that.
also id be interested to see what other article the author has written in regards to this general topic..
and how the 'public relations' is received depend on the audience. privacy advocates could interpret coverage of this topic as positive, if it highlights privacy aspects of the asset.
to the average person, i still think this would be viewed as negative pr. im assuming the article will contain references to dark market purchases, will almost certainly mention silk road, and various ransomware/ person ransoms and scams.
everyone hates scammers, like LEGIT scammers.
I guess i would say this is status quo, they are framing a particular open source monetary network as dangerous, and criminally adjacent.
but yes anyone got a paywall free link
1
so you think it's just a journalist doing their job?
what incentive does Bloomberg have to do PR for Monero?
to be honest it was purely a surface level observation of the tweet and how the general community responds to mainstream media covering a topic we are passionate about. they cant win lmao
currently trying to find non paywall version of the article so i can read it
currently trying to find non paywall version of the article so i can read it
1
what do you think?
nostr:nevent1qqsduywh2fu7mt9sr5f538yvgjp6s33uhs0vsl9268y6cxchmzx2qucpg3mhxw309ahhsarjv3jhvctkxc685d35093rw7pkwf4xwdrww3a8z6ngv4jx6dtzx4ax5ut4d36kw6mwdpa8ydpkdeunyutzv9jzummwd9hkutcz...
Why aren't they talking about this tech?!?!
They want it surpressed cause blah blah blah.
Why are they talking about this tech!?!
It must be because they infiltrated devs.
I think that if a particular person or group, using your favorite open source tech forces you to question stuff including the devs being infiltrated, you are dumb. And don't understand open source at all.
They want it surpressed cause blah blah blah.
Why are they talking about this tech!?!
It must be because they infiltrated devs.
I think that if a particular person or group, using your favorite open source tech forces you to question stuff including the devs being infiltrated, you are dumb. And don't understand open source at all.
1
No. White sucks. But black also sucks.
Have some sort of dark gray with a slight color tint. It should have some personality
I like the built-in. 'Night mode' on android its like an amber hue.
I am increasingly getting fed up full black UIs. They feel lifeless and dead
But my eyes semi!
I aint built like you
I aint built like you
1