@Dean
Relays (3)
- wss://nostr.mom/ – read & write
- wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
- wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/ – read & write
Recent Notes
for what it's worth, im still running bitcoin core v28.0.0
But v30+ and LibreRelay exist and they need a response. Sitting on older versions of Core does not help or in any way assert a dissaproval of v30+
1
Announcing that you're unfollowing someone is about the most cringe way of announcing your narcissism.
So of course Boomers are doing this constantly.
Is it just me or it seems to be an increasing trend to dunk on boomers? I mean, criticise a behavior fair enough, but generalising it to an entire democratic is pretty cheap.
* not a boomer
* not a boomer
Rather than choosing their tribe based on shared principles, most people just reprogram their principles around whatever their tribe is doing.
Did people really have an alternative prior to the internet?
🤔 actually... That makes sense. I admit, I never looked closely enough at how inscriptions work to know this... How do they figure they own them if the sats are unspendable? How would they go about...
I probably was being a bit facetious by saying they burned them as they technically can still spend them (which is how they move the ownership of the inscription) but the transaction fee would already be more than the 1000 sats in the utxo so from a monetary sense they burned it but not from an NFT sense. If they really think someone attributes some value to owning the inscription that person might pay some money, making up for the high relative transaction fee. Same point stands though.
New Soft Fork Proposal Being Censored?
https://blossom.primal.net/2968af50836f9f1b3a58865ed2604522d60e4c99361bf8668f77b6a1a28d15ac.mp4
@Comte de Sats Germain can you really call it stealing. No one becomes a new owner of those Sats and the original owner already burned them. What they think they own is the inscription data etc, but really they are expecting us all to pay for its preservation forever.
1❤1