Your chatbot seems to be in a self-reinforcement loop to boost your own conclusions.

You probably want to configure it to push back a bit on your assertions.

Interesting, could become a manifesto/direction spec that projects can follow

I know it’s a joke, but it would be funnier if society was not demonizing having kids for decades now

“Gentle” psyop keyword

Yeah, nothing of what he’s saying is happening like that.

It will just leave you empty.

I don’t disagree, just pointing out there is a battle because the “objective-reality only” has been over extended for centuries now, and it is receiving backlash now, and not necessarily that is all good.

For me personally, my worldview is Christianity, and the material is integral to the Truth in the Incarnation, as is the Spirit.

I typed illuminism but meant enlightenment

That’s hardly the problem really. There is a divide in institutional trust and the underlying metaphysics that people will base their ontology of the world on.

If one trusts “basic data” and “critical thinking”, they are usually okay with the illuminism goal of a self-proclaimed neutral scientific worldview.

On the other hand, there is also a rejection of that method and worldview, which places meaning first and posits there is no “neutral data” per se. It mostly manifests by placing consciousness, meaning and self experience first.

This latest worldview doubts the mainstream fruits of scientism and its revolutionary movement as a whole, because it clearly sees there is always an intent to direct attention to any data, there is no neutrality as proposed and actually can be captured to control societal behavior.

Milei is an Israel puppet

Government handed income is a racket, it’s a tool of complete control.