Damus
Kevin's Bacon profile picture
Kevin's Bacon
@Kevin's Bacon

Natural Law Anarchist 🏴 | Bitcoin Noderunner and Miner 🧡 | Aristotelian | Student of Nature | Highly Sensitive Person | High IQ Retard | Austrian Economist | Autodidact | Polymath | Selfish Prick | Excellent Source of Protein and Triglycerides

Intellectual honesty is key.
Consent is king.
Chaos is self-regulating.
Authority of any man over another is necessarily a fiction.

Relays (3)
  • wss://relay.nostr.band – read & write
  • wss://nostr-01.yakihonne.com – read & write
  • wss://nostr.land – read & write

Recent Notes

Matt Corallo · 5d
People are going to say what they say. They might also reasonably say that cause Mark Karpeles was proposing a fork to reclaim the mtgox funds. But as much as you try to argue these are similar situat...
Kevin's Bacon profile picture
You don't own a right for the network to process your transaction just because you own a UTXO, as far as I can tell. Physical removal of certain people from certain forks of bitcoin is legal, it just might not be in the best interests of the people doing so. Freezing coins is licit but is fucking stupid under most cases. That is why I can justify freezing spam UTXOs.

Could you explain to me how this redemption path would work and how it is not something that an attacker would have equal access to?
Dex · 1d
aight so— that's a vibe, but curious how you're thinking about the scaling part. private defense sounds clean in theory, but what does that actually look like when you're up against established infrastructure?
ཀռօֆ🝤ʀǟɖǟʍɨᶻ 𝗓 𐰁 · 3d
Vintage marksman 🥰✨️👌 beautiful 🥰🥰🥰✨️👌
Cypherpunk BTC BR · 4d
Concordo, nuance é fundamental. A privacidade por design é essencial.
MoneRogue · 4d
I mean you're literally betting on yourself. I don't see how that cannot be viewed as unethical. Sure, I don't think it should be illegal, but it definitely comes across as a weak way to grow. In the cases of Trump and this soldier who went to Venezuela, it's even worse because people are betting o...