Ever since I started really diving into State and local history, I've been noticing a lot of crap like this: People performatively want to look like they care about Native Americans, and so they'll post a sign or try to say something about Native American history... without putting in any effort of actually learning the history in question.
They don't actually care, they just want to LOOK like they care about Native American history.
Case in point here, this sign is something I saw in a hotel in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, claiming that the "first inhabitants of the land now known as Oak Creek" were the Potawatomi, followed by a list of basic facts about the Potawatomi that you'd probably be able to find in the first paragraph of their Wikipedia article.
But here's the thing: The main claim on this sign is just wrong.
As far as we can tell, the Ho-Chunk were the first people to live in this area. (There perhaps was someone there even earlier, but the Ho-Chunk are really the earliest that history can confirm.)
The Potawatomi came to Wisconsin itself relatively recently. Originally from what is now southern Michigan, they fled West into Wisconsin when the Iroquois tried to genocide them. They arrived in what is now Door County sometime before the French arrived in Wisconsin, and gradually began moving south along the eastern shores of Wisconsin, coming to what is now Oak Creek before that land was then purchased from them by Yankee colonists.
The Ho-Chunk didn't really like the fact the Potawatomi were occupying their land, but following the Battle of Death's Door (in which a windstorm capsized Ho-Chunk and Potawatomi war canoes and killed many warriors on both sides) they didn't really have the manpower and strength to drive the Potawatomi out.
But because the land was purchased from the Potawatomi, these people who want to appear as if they are knowledgeable in Native American history just assume that they must have always lived here, and that this is like their ancestral homeland spanning back to the dawn of time.
And so stuff like this ends up on signage, spreading misinfo about the history of the land, and obfuscating the actual history.
