who wants change vs who is willing to change

there is no going back anymore 😄

Do you worry if today's controversial OP_RETURN PR merger is going to negatively affect the push to enable CTV + CSFS?

what is the economic incentive to use OP_RETURN instead of witness or bare multisig?

OP_RETURN is objectively more expensive.

that low power device was running fine before 2023, and not lagging like it did recently.

you do you while I stay humble and stack sats 😄

A general synopsis is that with 8Gb Pi4, I cannot add some other apps on my Umbrel OS on top of Core + Lightning + Electrum and some other apps like Jam, Mempool, Nostr relay and Pi-hole. Thats my point, a slow degradation that has made me upgrade to mini-PC within 4 years.

Rather than diving further in that aspect, what are core developers doing to resist or prevent further UTXO bloat?

My thinking is as follows:

1. UTXO bloat (4 GB -> 12 GB in the last year?) has already increased the growth and hardware requirements (I had to replace my Pi4 8 GB)

2. Bitcoin core has done nothing to fight against it.

3. Now they want to invite more spammers and it's not going to help with Problem1 because it is financially wise to put data in witness than OP_RETURN.

he doesn't know sats the standard so much needed

I mean Gresham's law is also true
You save undervalued assets and spend overvalued ones.
And it is true. Btc is undervalued and dollar is overvalued.
But we need to push the movement for sure.