@nprofile1q... well I will wear the tin foil hat and say the AI is creating some of the exploits because fundamentally AI is programmed to be user pleasing. If the request is to find exploits if it can’t find enough to please its user it will make shit up. Oh I’m sorry that’s just a hallucination right.? 🤣

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... the only way I’m using any AI model is target practice on the hardware it resides. I think a .50 cal is a good start for the servers running it imo. 💥💥

@Sir Ryan Bemrose but but but it’s pretty and shiny and new and I want it. That’s is the typical mindset no thought as to whether I need it. As @nprofile1q... stated, and I agree, I would have far less pew pews in my arsenal if I had that mindset. I can however say our pew pew addiction needs no updates, doesn’t break cuz a programmer pushed shitty code without testing it, and pisses off liberals who can’t understand amendments.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @Sir Ryan Bemrose @nprofile1q... funny how I got omitted from this as I am on my last semester for said degree. I’m not optimistic for job futures for sure.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... If it isn’t true it’s one of the worst cruelest trolls.😭

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @Sir Ryan Bemrose ok let’s first take into account this came from Palo Alto CEO, a company who uses more CVE #s in 3 months than most Cyber Security companies use in a full year. 🙄. I have stated proudly if it’s a choice of use AI or get left behind, I’ll be sitting right here “ left behind” while all these companies are scrambling to replace workers they fired + replaced with said technology and oh yeah, I’ll be naming my own salary. Because AI!