@nprofile1q... (I think?) I understand your point, but I don't agree with your initial premise. If a person wanted to say "your small change will have bad consequences down the road", they should have said so, or choose a different metaphor that doesn't compare the work of others to a malignant decease whose only point is to feed from the host until it destroys it.
I think the choice of the word "cancer" is not unfortunate, but deliberate, and it is intended to minimize any further discussion and infuriate part of the community, which may not be a CoC violation itself, but surely saying "R4L is a cancer" fails *all* the Linux CoC goals:
