Okay fiatboi

You think fiat bankers and those beholden to them aren't impure? That explains a lot.

The BIP is not designed to increase the cost of spam. It's designed to close OP_RETURN.

Those opposed keep saying it doesn't increase the cost of spam or solve spam to try and keep people from supporting the BIP. The BIP specifically addresses this and states clearly that the BIP is not designed to remove all spam. It's to close specific attack vectors.

I am an ignorant fool because I don't want to have anything to do with someone's code that is in bed with fiat bankers? I'm not going to read or hire someone to read someone's code that is in bed with the central banking system. Not worth a minute of my time or a single sat.

Miners have 0 incentive to activate as of yet. Besides (as a 110 supporter), I'd prefer miners to not activate it, because I do not want to centralize miner power. Nodes matter, not miners. Nodes set the rules and miners adhere to those rules. 0% miner activation is my preference.

Do you want to let anyone store anything they want on your node? Legal or otherwise?

Weird how @primal won't show my previous comment... You mean Rob the guy who Lloyd's bank invests in? Yeah GTFO. I don't trust fiat brained asshats

Its interesting to see so many people get upset over this soft fork, especially since their rhetoric is that it is dead on arrival. If they hate those of us running BIP-110 so much they should write a URSF with their daylight hours instead of spending 24/7 bashing people who support BIP-110. They keep saying it will cause a chain split. Shouldn't they be applauding us if that is the case? It will mean they have shitcore all to themselves and we would be on another chain. Or, it could be they are corrupt and beholden to others who wish bitcoin to fail.

Futures markets are one of the most fiat things around. They require a centralized market. Get out of here with your fiat brain rot.

Why not use a nostr relay to store your jpegs? Why must you force them on my node? No thanks.

It only needs 55% to be activated early. It activates no matter what, even if miners don't signal. It probably would be better for the health of the ecosystem if it isn't a miner activated softfork (we don't want miner centralization even for good soft forks). If it doesn't get the 55% miners to signal then it will be a user activated soft fork. Right now ~15% of nodes (similar to bip 148) are running RDTS. That means a significant portion of the network will not accept blocks with arbitrary data. This incentivizes miners to respect the rules of node runners.

When only Nvidia can afford the SSDs needed to run a node